Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues.

[Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>]

You are absolutely correct.

I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' 
and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin 
undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated.

On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the 
values were not recognised.

Thank you.

I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006 
build. Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet 
working, so I have nothing to report about gateway usage at present.



On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite 
> lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are 
> several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, 
> and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with 
> "overhead" or "atm".
>
> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version 
> of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, 
> but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this 
> combination crop up ourselves recently.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>