From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7ECA21F7CB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E572204E7; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:52:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:52:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=EaNcgG1gxe+/igVYDqGlveKhGcY=; b=xLGBZp Egr8OHJn/O4vDeYnG/rq3VI5gQEk1rePsEbNV4ek9BuwjrCMNH5qJzLUXwcUVrhV ytwiDMMji4BIsDvvue4KDNCozPMwhCDGpDNCQ0fp3rabE2XNemec7fsj6W5bYGW8 Sfz/FjbqgGRZ0J2azbXzzh7bKEwNth5dLKgBU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=EaNcgG1gxe+/igV YDqGlveKhGcY=; b=o2Gm0TAcRT5BzcS3c/5VR92OQ+o0TpnyoL9bM7dMETUcJyo qP0Zjjm/Ggo/FfiDS8tm8SkDYEoyt7Nf3bo73gw2jK1tqgzNdjLPXlugdlj02bD5 F6TqGJd12QNUydxRsPzW9hbVV0xMy1+2nt7XxSSQvmMuCoOZQwTqbZVqL80o= X-Sasl-enc: oqTlNKcNm1LmEHk3m7DB9k7/A8ooJKmBrmlDyhjJvgyl 1436539961 Received: from [192.168.42.126] (host-92-29-181-214.as13285.net [92.29.181.214]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E83C6801CD; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:52:41 -0400 (EDT) References: <559FA8D4.2030305@imap.cc> To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jonathan Morton From: Fred Stratton Message-ID: <559FDC38.9010400@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:52:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:53:12 -0000 You are absolutely correct. I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated. On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the values were not recognised. Thank you. I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006 build. Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet working, so I have nothing to report about gateway usage at present. On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite > lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are > several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, > and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with > "overhead" or "atm". > > What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version > of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, > but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this > combination crop up ourselves recently. > > - Jonathan Morton >