From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76FCC21FEDC for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgxm20 with SMTP id m20so69242343wgx.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=labM1e8kPlnPxyzuDw8/iO8MJV5FqikH/sNfROL6Oq8=; b=gbOKhhssqnF7yjdILAnV/aXEqZSbWSfge1bcP1ToEvKS/vNOnHbhomkiDtL/jeyWQ/ c2GBxO0CM31E8a8SvMWUgV9bxKMnacEL5Frwhj9D5yjBIKR3bOAFLmw9Mec0K1c5WM3y NfBlZSJaZF0/3mMCQk1RtYcEHq1g9sceR8YQr263V91//hzguRPFbQBFkm/XS2hDz0LV 7vZbSsjp8G67Zm3hAkmYAr+Jt+3SokiuA5smRA2UpHzCdxyM3GaS9uZE9ZzOrYn6SZ7S FKXEOyE/O3tfJSxbN+BY3gyIgaDqhYuTJi3F+O/fsaF38FKTlqMW6v8naCJEQb7oVu5U 5Rrg== X-Received: by 10.194.246.105 with SMTP id xv9mr42585652wjc.135.1436542775190; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from volcano.localdomain (host-89-243-101-54.as13285.net. [89.243.101.54]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fm8sm3465273wib.9.2015.07.10.08.39.33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:39:34 -0700 (PDT) To: Rich Brown References: <559FA8D4.2030305@imap.cc> <559FDC38.9010400@imap.cc> <89F3E053-5EA3-40F8-9853-4452B0722467@gmail.com> From: Alan Jenkins Message-ID: <559FE735.9000106@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:39:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <89F3E053-5EA3-40F8-9853-4452B0722467@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] "Lupin undeclared"? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:40:05 -0000 On 10/07/15 16:16, Rich Brown wrote: > Hi Fred, > > I'm not familiar with "lupin undeclared" - could you send a pointer/link? Thanks. > > Rich The unversioned testing build Dave posted at http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar71xx/ which is not declared on the CeroWrt homepage. (Presumably to avoid giving a false impression about how much life and commitment there is in those builds). > On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Fred Stratton wrote: > >> You are absolutely correct. >> >> I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated. >> >> On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the values were not recognised. >> >> Thank you. >> >> I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006 build. Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet working, so I have nothing to report about gateway usage at present. unrelated, but ow, you have my sympathy. I'd love to have a working lantiq with openwrt and fq_codel. >> >> >> >> On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with "overhead" or "atm". >>> >>> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this combination crop up ourselves recently. >>> >>> - Jonathan Morton >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel