From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omr1.cc.vt.edu (omr1.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:2fc:76e3:30de]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B473321F175 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr5.cc.vt.edu (mr5.cc.vt.edu [198.82.141.27] (may be forged)) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0KGDjYv004531; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:13:45 -0500 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr5.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0KGDeri007250; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:13:45 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2001:468:c80:2103:9d4f:7a08:ff85:a8fc]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0KGDcQw014774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:13:38 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Enrico Mioso In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:28:48 +0100." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <877fy7myfb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <54811670.5030703@audiocodes.com> <8761dqjuuh.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1421770418_3227P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:13:38 -0500 Message-ID: <5605.1421770418@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr5.cc.vt.edu Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [discuss] [cdc_ncm] Refactoring cdc_ncm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:14:18 -0000 --==_Exmh_1421770418_3227P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:28:48 +0100, Enrico Mioso said: > We are trying to change the way the cdc_ncm.c driver generate frames. W= e need > to let it order parts of the packet in a different way. You're going to have to repeat that, and explain why you think re-orderin= g parts of the packet is going to work. (Hint - what happens when this packet wi= th oddly ordered parts arrives at a host that is expecting RFC-standard orde= ring?) --==_Exmh_1421770418_3227P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBVL5+sgdmEQWDXROgAQJMnA/+MDQRqBbTXM+Hk7XYfYWrAXdSM6cBuH0Y Zei2G0GEyHJO8zAlQKqgALIoTAPEIcP9auhkEnvtFbTGvUTmeePiZq3YRuAgbpzG lyI2kftbsUXkSPr0R+ONAoYx5TmQfmyBL7y2TFkw5WPMqelZ1iuou1P1hT/cEtyH Kwq5guh3G2yBXSPRPpBuhFYI2x/6t70ioL4hDoUFeAaVbCrFhD8zyy9YBdJ2vA/g 8b6D+lcw8l+ifuFjEouYudMzbG6nJ7Y6l6MirZSZPBJ0/79QRIfZv4EamNdOxRuG WwhRGCjXnsk4sbvhhrzAg1p6MlkuqnSQsyJkMZxpmuaBKm+oXhvervp6afmubLqX O/LdnnYBsgl17KnAg/djqCyTVElklMy+DRR2f8o4urwVsJV27eqSFs3K1/CxJGEd +xatqnPi+zUCNiTOySfl2EjePSJZ6rHJeuhiqqD8fJ5By4W/O0BMCzu3BlxWljSw dHodRVCAhGwm+QoAtcNEehFq5XlvSobQSIiEL3wY8VTiqBSzHTHVvOPc+0JtIVo8 X7shghDhHFkSVsyb0rAlYYk/jCUyYVSk4V4O8O+Jl1nJGLsWJhisX94zIYwzpDP6 fkIIEeA89fBM4/18RfkZPsDy/obXJCYJgS9WtUOzST5ODpk6tySunH9tYntMmaJx d6fpHbfx7Mc= =ZNXH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1421770418_3227P--