From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com (mail2.candelatech.com [208.74.158.173]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AB221FAD2; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.65] (firewall.candelatech.com [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E28E740A5C4; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat References: <20150818200840.31F771EF@taggart.lackof.org> <20150818203315.DF3861EF@taggart.lackof.org> <5601D155.9050609@candelatech.com> From: Isaac Konikoff Message-ID: <560D8009.4060103@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:48:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5601D155.9050609@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:50:51 -0000 Found an interesting way to bind firefox to an interface, so I can run http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest from eth1, sta1, sta2, etc...to test the wifi to internet path of different APs even though it eventually all goes through our main router at the cable modem. http://www.ryde.net/code/bind.c.txt Anyway, here are some results: eth0 on my desktop: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1516977 eth1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517395 sta1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517298 sta2 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517364 eth1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517769 sta1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517821 sta2 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517871 On 09/22/2015 03:08 PM, Isaac Konikoff wrote: > Started testing an onhub box with lanforge and flent...just wifi to lan > side for now compared to a netgear r8000. > > Configuration of the onhub is somewhat limited because you have to use > the google-on app and many settings are not available such as picking a > channel, setting ht/mcs rates, disabling encryption, etc... Also, it > appears that the wan port requires a live internet connection for any > functionality at all. > > Here are some reports and data on what I've tested so far: > candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2 > > Here are some sample plots from the data: > candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/rtt_fair4be-box-plot-comparison.png > > > candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/tcp-download-box-plot-comparison.png > > > candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/10stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp-only.png > > > candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/63stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp+tcp.png > > > I'm planning to do some more comparisons with other ap's or maybe some > additional flent tests to netperf.bufferbloat.net. I'll publish those > results when available. > > Isaac > > On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box >> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi >> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results. >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >