From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <smithbone@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDC321F424
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkfm62 with SMTP id m62so81234341qkf.1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=H/j/ba9oAEecv5ctFKCtJ9BJpl1twSpmfyckP2ESano=;
	b=yLYj8h5eQt5T2RFmFgbK2grZRHrJd8p0nYqvwmA0X8ZZsPVnzJPZTXUlZEOJu2Wwie
	wKxSzODJwM3tUko2FnfMDcWLR/yAytwPFL1w8f+UM4/iC1NsrNwvLmFeB4K7a/ofqQCv
	FRwfOCq2OlyHjFQsG1C+50J5aNqmw6tlpLye4UTkwUYMU/0AFjIRXm74/tlG+EMnguCp
	7bBiM3L/xoXfBGiV8qI+Ay65do9QsUI0cUm6G5I39j3iFBGFnEupIxZbVVxqMEiuGGiS
	Z9DQF6/9uXWFFa34MboU02o5FR+7DF/UrJlYsYVrhK7nCg43D92PxqMpvbb2YxuBwLzu
	kuKA==
X-Received: by 10.140.132.139 with SMTP id 133mr27478747qhe.49.1445618756753; 
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.172] (207-180-163-171.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com.
	[207.180.163.171]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	e51sm7742573qge.46.2015.10.23.09.45.55
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <562A6443.5080404@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:45:55 -0400
From: Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw5==BBpf4w8hVSa4eqnYu9DkbtB_G0F0NMf=Xdpm=Lv+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<FBC66E3C-6009-4053-8138-6A122AF1ECD2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBC66E3C-6009-4053-8138-6A122AF1ECD2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:46:20 -0000

On 10/23/2015 12:21 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
> Two other thoughts:
>
> 1) The WNDR3700v2 will struggle to (well, it won't) keep up with a > 100 mbps uplink.
> 2) The numbers in the SQM page are in kilobits, not megabits/sec.

Nod.  That's why egress/ingress was set to 10000.  Well within the range 
of the WNDR3700v2.

-- 
Richard A. Smith