From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97E921F515 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkca6 with SMTP id a6so84194380qkc.3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mQKyV2rXoQStlj2qEMlpEtQUUEyS1QqE5ln+6HTg97s=; b=al1q4TjR2oj3gmQgZqo4eOJcV3v7HgV8LK24uL2qND2qsbD+LCChDb+0XhvcfU2GyU edm4wxG+etzQP97qBGe4w5zs3Y+Fc1GxzPaGol1QVrX1K0Pmjy80fuaJ7lgIMURQuuOR Zew4DPx2zK46tOSJTfuPQIaQ02AIkmQ6LQWik1B2mI+dp8Ldfr4BaDPRMR/c8rSYTTr5 kw31QjA3wduX+/8lKwspd5ljmIPEoltB+DFUXUeHRbEf4CJXb97eX8Q1tWQps2rw45m0 8MuE7aPtQccRReRhL8P3vlyLJCGri2/0bG7+Bj7Sm6DS1yIi+iImGXvt2YirtPAEX0nn TzIQ== X-Received: by 10.140.20.102 with SMTP id 93mr26761877qgi.40.1445622496643; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (207-180-163-171.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.171]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u70sm7882779qku.18.2015.10.23.10.48.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <562A72DF.6050107@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:48:15 -0400 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Wood References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:48:40 -0000 On 10/23/2015 01:22 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith > wrote: > > I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test. > > I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory > firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled. > > > Here are my results with the same router (unless the WRT1900ACS is > different from the WRT1900AC): > http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-160mbps.html > > So I built and installed an openwrt trunk but the results were very > non-impressive. Rrul test reported mulit-seconds of latency and it > was equally non-impressive with sqm enabled or disabled. So I > assumed that sqm in trunk on this device must not work yet. Then I > wondered how well sqm in trunk was tested and that perhaps its > broken for all devices. > > > Trunk or the Chaos Calmer release? (I"m running CC RC1) If I understand your question correctly I did both. I built trunk (for both WRT1900ACS and WNDR700v2. Then downloaded the current CC from openwrt.org and installed sqm. > My test setup: > > Which ports on the DUT were you using? are those local ports, or is one > of those the "internet" port? I was using both WAN & LAN. Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT LAN<-->DUT WAN<--1000baseT-->Server -- Richard A. Smith