Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com>
To: "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de>, "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved)
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:07:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com>

On 10/25/2015 11:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote:

> So I started to try and re-create my steps for failure..  I _am_ able to
> duplicate the problem but I'm not able to figure out how.  It seems to
> just come and go irrespective of what I'm doing with the DUT.  I'm
> mostly in then bad state but every so often things work as expected.

I figured it out and now I feel _really_ stupid.  The problem was having 
WiFi enabled on my laptop.

The netperf server is running on a machine which sits on my 192.168.11.x 
network.  I've been testing things by connecting up the DUT WAN to that 
network and then using 192.168.1.x (or 172.30.42.x) as the DUT LAN side.

My wireless network is bridged to 192.168.11.x.. Yes, Yes, I know this 
is bad but I haven't put in the time to figure out how to configure 
things such that all the broadcast stuff like printers and chromecast 
Just Work in a routed world.  The SO gets unhappy with me when they are 
broken and it's difficult to explain the reasoning.  It's on the TODO.

network-manager automatically connects wlan0 to that network.

When I plug up the ethernet cable network-manager sets up eth0 as the 
default route but, doesn't shutdown existing wlan0 connections.  So 
talking to the DUT via ssh or http: works as expected. However, when I run:

netperf-wrapper -H server -l 15 --disable-log -p all rrul

If I forgot to turn off WiFi then I'm completely bypassing the DUT and 
testing my WiFi network instead. "This is not the network you are 
looking for."

Sigh.  Sorry for all the noise.  Thanks for everyones help. Now I'll get 
back to the original task of comparing the performance of the 1900acs 
factory firmware vs openwrt trunk with sqm.

-- 
Richard A. Smith

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-25 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-23 16:10 [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm Richard Smith
2015-10-23 16:13 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-23 16:21   ` Rich Brown
2015-10-23 16:45     ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 16:43   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:42     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:15   ` David Lang
2015-10-23 17:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-10-23 17:30   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:50     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:45   ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:22 ` Aaron Wood
2015-10-23 17:47   ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:48   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:57   ` David Lang
2015-10-23 19:08     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 18:05   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 18:41 ` Michael Richardson
2015-10-23 20:18   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 22:48     ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24  7:59       ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 22:51     ` Aaron Wood
2015-10-23 22:53     ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24  8:07       ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-24 16:34         ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24 16:52           ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-24 18:58             ` David P. Reed
2015-10-25 23:21             ` David Lang
2015-10-26  9:53               ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-24 17:24           ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-24 17:30             ` Aaron Wood
2015-10-24 10:20 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-24 17:21   ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 15:10     ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 16:07       ` Richard Smith [this message]
2015-10-25 17:36         ` [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) Rich Brown
2015-10-25 20:02           ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 20:33             ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 20:44               ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 11:17                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-26 12:35                   ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 11:50             ` Dave Taht
2015-10-26 12:27               ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 13:41                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 13:48                   ` Dave Taht
2015-10-26 18:15                     ` David Lang
2015-10-26 18:26                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 18:31                         ` David Lang
2015-10-26 21:01                     ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 22:23                       ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 13:50                   ` [Cerowrt-devel] ***UNCHECKED*** " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-26 14:30                     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 21:54                       ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 22:04                         ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 20:07         ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 21:50         ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-25 22:44           ` Richard Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com \
    --to=smithbone@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox