From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A783221F7C8 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkfq3 with SMTP id q3so12276855qkf.3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yythlebC3NNHYcqSLVSXJymlFJKY1DRTU4ncdmectiw=; b=Xt8CeDwzU4SIn5pwQvz7T2LtFQOonOtowizjwcZtgn9EPN77tT5tpEUN4Z8jsFiy4L ZShmm+khoy/Zhh348HpeRkTjRCJFgD0vX2CgsFcG/HUU9Lg81S1S949bjY7cDCqngURp W7z+6i6WOF4JXs154YyF+Xri+4UVM8YvoWudkD/CP9+MzFd1/WxpNqI/iHi1EORa0XGd Pbep5Ne/Vm4XLEQI9J2+uKFn48uMpJkLP9MEaNo26DMMrS9Nh6kU7qKdvZnP8mjuhaq4 smwBfpE914IxfqPjgzDy/ENGutbTrRSyHRyU+0i0EUaxl/Aw6qctJefLu6bTzAZdni7i Gyzg== X-Received: by 10.55.197.88 with SMTP id p85mr41315678qki.44.1445862457019; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.184] (c-24-61-11-132.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.61.11.132]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm12991605qkl.13.2015.10.26.05.27.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <562E1C37.4000506@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:27:35 -0400 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> <562D353D.9000308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:28:01 -0000 On 10/26/2015 07:50 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > I am extremely disappointed you deleted your (admittedly inadvertent) > wifi results. Oops, sorry. Trying to prevent confusion since they were misleading. > Did you keep them anywhere? Now that we know what was wrong they > become way more interesting in the context of make-wifi-fast. It's google so they are never really gone. :) Restored. https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-P0wCbNmKvAWnl6dUc1bVhMaU0&usp=sharing Note: They are apples to oranges. What was marked as 1900acs "bad" was actually a WNDR3800 running OpenWrt Barrier Breaker r40727 / LuCI Trunk (svn-r10180). If you want more WiFi traces with latency I can give you _loads_ of those. :) From both here in my apt and at work. Just tell me what you want. I've got wndr3700v2's, Archer C7v2's, and now the Linksys 1900acs. What I don't have is a laptop with an AC chipset only N. I've got acess to a Mac Air with AC to test with, but so far its thwarted me on getting flent to work. I need to research how to compile the netperf package with options using homebrew. I'm still a total noob when using a Mac. -- Richard A. Smith