From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3342A21F703 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkfq3 with SMTP id q3so19014517qkf.3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kd4cRJre+1zVC5xqjtBtHoCw6IGCNyGnLWxFM4qjOvo=; b=jBXSRqrtZaJy96M5tDAI+vNc2fCF0dXw1pAr8PBzCPFQkUYqfIVxDST3JQXoi5nvlr LvM/qcFOWfQgnDcHkwO2L3AzbhGfSwCmtYOwgprLCjqeyC1hv0Y+stJMsokh/MZLSvt4 cKXT/JP4GpgXVicPEjSRlfEutIlLSOGHmgP+rIPVE0ooXWI9/XIp5I2K9uA55FtdYuca nNDPE8aU3Wnr3XlI+WrM1rLz7HfC73XqjP0+qX2inNehjeu/thkGyTfDYwQe/c8THJUZ hhNJl7WJotRepfNvK1LEZ44RELe/iXJibeBf8U3oMcSeJUVwMJlngikexUE+7aCQNPPl Wmsg== X-Received: by 10.55.78.149 with SMTP id c143mr16304541qkb.107.1445893268938; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.175] (207-180-163-171.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.171]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i21sm13806847qkh.48.2015.10.26.14.01.08 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <562E9493.8070603@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:01:07 -0400 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , Sebastian Moeller References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> <562D353D.9000308@gmail.com> <562E1C37.4000506@gmail.com> <02FDF355-F509-47E2-B63C-20CCE0ACA890@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:01:32 -0000 On 10/26/2015 09:48 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > in terms of testing wifi, the most useful series of tests to conduct > at the moment - since we plan to fix per station queuing soon - are > the rtt_fair tests, against multiple wifi stations. Run it all against > one station, then 2, then 4. In that scenario are you flipping the roles? ie what I've been thinking of as a the wired "server" becomes the client talking to netperf servers running on each station? or is it station to station(s)? Involving more stations is a bit more difficult. I don't have that many at my apt and using more stations at work is tricky since people are using them. :) I might be able to recruit a few machines though. -- Richard A. Smith