From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98EC321F6A2 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qgad10 with SMTP id d10so132268939qga.3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:23:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W4V8MsugtcyO4j82VmulEmpPiVSLvIaWawhRLCJgttI=; b=BYP4vKwqiHypU+VPflzWtn+moxV9GAenqjXzbUJfkBkUw3gO64tjb04JI6xf/JfWJh DAG/f5XgzZ3czG/syJ2IPv43A1YjJVHKZl0ZZX2Sj3Sfpe02IUiI3zzX9ld+i2IJsLTD aqQRF8GCic+CisDcTwuie54CBlj4yvjjCH9W/6sPee9V2YkzftLCqOcKEIqf+l0I9oPk nfrgduw3ntqOn9unPBbvfui4ut9EDlfqiuVaaXCH8vXQ4OAxORgfT7JKjF+JQhCO88rL nSx4LiKBQhTu/tbOFK7yKhiZQ/ry8QkmABRFJiswnUT/qH2lqqiJrxF2Z5fDrdfEI+4g Sm8g== X-Received: by 10.141.23.20 with SMTP id z20mr41912585qhd.52.1445898209334; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.175] (207-180-163-171.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.171]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k109sm11709080qgf.9.2015.10.26.15.23.28 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <562EA7E0.4060105@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:23:28 -0400 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , Sebastian Moeller References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> <562D353D.9000308@gmail.com> <562E1C37.4000506@gmail.com> <02FDF355-F509-47E2-B63C-20CCE0ACA890@gmx.de> <562E9493.8070603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <562E9493.8070603@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:23:52 -0000 On 10/26/2015 05:01 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 10/26/2015 09:48 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >> in terms of testing wifi, the most useful series of tests to conduct >> at the moment - since we plan to fix per station queuing soon - are >> the rtt_fair tests, against multiple wifi stations. Run it all against >> one station, then 2, then 4. rtt_fair appears to try and contact snapon which isn't working. Is there a testing recipe up anywhere? -- Richard A. Smith