From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5CE21F1D4 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from hms-beagle-3.localdomain ([89.0.38.184]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LviG8-1VRGak3xPQ-017YD3 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:22:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:22:12 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <56938ED3-0D0A-4269-BCC4-6C8D5BB3BAE8@gmx.de> References: To: Richard O X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W9VPpNEaw4RuMX4tYNlpHn3NISbuRlFzFAJg1FhdLG9PsAiXzmv F8rZE3Gyn+dEFvsrvthXDOpA0gO7X8YHIpbRXg5EHs07opNebrOUGR63O9VCQh+OIlskAeA 3V2E1A1ZbWmbzSiT6CagXDe1c+JDZwtWEXCRs+W+YyZ8ZZ6jJFvMC689nXTDdYrvgR/fSGB hB8WDlsEe7MIIDhSN4uqg== Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Cero 3.10.24-5 no longer supports multiple AQMs? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:22:14 -0000 Hi Richard, On Dec 22, 2013, at 09:38 , Richard O wrote: > Heya, >=20 > I'll try to keep this short, but I'm simply just an end-user of Cero = who has > using it for a few months now. It's been great! So great that I've = been > using it as my main router after the first few weeks. >=20 > Anyway, I've just recently upgraded from 3.10.11-2 to the latest build > (3.10.42-5), and I noticed that you can only set one AQM at any given = time. > Restoring my old settings restores my old set of AQMs - all of which = startup > nicely - but only two out four have their "ingress" start up: ifb0 and = ifb1 > while ifb2 and ifb3 remain down. Their entries still appear in the = firewall > and I'm unable to bring them up using ifconfig.=20 >=20 If I recall correctly, we just disabled the ability to setup AQM = on multiple interfaces, as to our knowledge it was not clear whether it = would work at all and whether someone had actually tested it. It should = be relatively easy to reenable it, if it works. Question, since most = people are happy with just running AQM on the wan link, why do you run = it on 4 interfaces? Best Regards Sebastian > As you can probably tell, I don't know very much Linux and simply use > rc.local to modify the classes and qdiscs for each interface to suit = my needs. >=20 > I'm just curious if this is going to be a permanent thing or not. = Other then > that, keep up the great work guys. Cero's been good to me, and I'll = probably > just revert to the old build if newer builds are going to be running = with a > single aqm. I never really did encountered any problems with it. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel