From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0BF3CBA8 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:51:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f105so64084431qge.2 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=chGABloIZtNfJ10k9/XkxGZGahpoZqQdhocH4V2+JFs=; b=sa9zQ9mTFxyVhfel4WSobaYicpYDsw36fB+Sjbl7QW6kQE129Ugex4tIVyfLAgPiKA iBH5vhHK0MGxd4jSaL61clVcg4z4UcON9TUOyJpYmw4lvey+qW8UxorD80erpgZQWAyh KQZ1Ew3emiKnMplzyAL+DnIClakIknmY+4YUO4g8A68cb+Z6H04/kmov06ieP3gHxQNC VDGjNA6sNVshEglH9T4KWCDxeXSNUxcIdGErmczKSfg/f6j8CERCd6cCvTwt08Ncn+pw 2BRtZbLN+mTGpaAQvV7pC892W6N/X/Wdu4dOkl7fN1PUgMI0XFF06+Jm32MZX7i8T+cJ g4oQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=chGABloIZtNfJ10k9/XkxGZGahpoZqQdhocH4V2+JFs=; b=f1FCnHt0axiSGlKzgXkViIbeN77p+s/Zm1J/yNX9Qk3H5XHbzGa4JC0f5KJgxtY0kT tpjom++pAScSJ72iul4wK74lehudhIeeXICeTKurnmtmf90xTwF450hS+oqZfelZwVcp u/4Icmo+khG8fcsSaPcZ8HIF3HDEXjtdrlMIAp4CFEEPbjzMtEccMXwvVoK4eBF9qOVs 8WrftuZ+x6ZjaDjwoisKIJ8FjVH41ZepoMoKhwLg7ZnzLbLDGNMvhoWpIHAdU2GgK5d4 rU5Xkai1z5C+W7fTRIv4zoYB53jWr3eUdiTO8mFxSTd6ilcDqo7AldqUkl426Or7hU3T YG8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKR/BNjmnRJgTsJEC6PTDTWFfhUHpnJZY/x63TiZ3Y25xVbpzaqMwcXEDknhap2oA== X-Received: by 10.140.203.65 with SMTP id y62mr6871483qha.40.1460116264409; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (c-24-61-11-132.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.61.11.132]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm5291125qhc.42.2016.04.08.04.51.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:02 -0700 (PDT) To: Dave Taht References: <57066793.5050608@gmail.com> Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" From: Richard Smith Message-ID: <57079B26.6040208@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:51:02 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:51:04 -0000 On 04/07/2016 11:24 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > The default firmware is quite horrificly bad, isn't it? :) Yeah. I had high hopes that they might have done something better out of the gate. > Total > starvation of anything but the first flow, for example, in the native > tests. > Do you have the exact version number of the 1900ac's default firmware > you tested. 1900ACS not AC. Slightly different hardware. ACS is a faster CPU ( (1.6Ghz) and more RAM. Firmware version is in the directory name. :) 'wrt1900acs_stockfw_1.0.0.169041' It was the latest firmware on the website when I ran the tests. > However, I'd have recommended you try 900mbit to see if cake/etc does > the right things, not 975mbit. Ok. I'll use 900 next time. -- Richard A. Smith