From: Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>, moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:51:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57079B37.4050008@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-MkZvxbviC7gE7EKBuUK4cFPLNFiXjfTAomZLRNHO11RQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/07/2016 04:36 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> Or I can't read properly... I have the first gen wrt1900ac. Dual-core
> 1.2GHz arm.
The 1900acs is 1.6Ghz. However remember my results are all local with
no cable providers in the way and thus no buffer bloat so even if the
hardware was the same. I'm not sure they compare apples-to-apples with
your tests.
It does however suggest that this box can run the higher complexity
algorithms and still maintain a lot of bandwidth.
> Is this stable enough for full-time usage (as a home router)?
Dunno. Currently on my network its a secondary device. It's behind my
primary NAT off on its own network.
It's stayed up 16d 11h so far with me running the wired flent tests and
with a few phones and tablet devices connected to it but I would not
call it very well used. Not sure when I might try and swap it in over
the WNDR3800. Messing with the stable network makes the SO unhappy. :)
--
Richard A. Smith
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 13:58 Richard Smith
2016-04-07 15:24 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-08 11:51 ` Richard Smith
2016-04-07 16:16 ` moeller0
2016-04-07 16:40 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-08 11:51 ` Richard Smith
2016-04-08 13:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-04-08 13:55 ` John Yates
2016-04-08 19:20 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces ko Sebastian Moeller
2016-04-07 17:42 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces Aaron Wood
2016-04-07 17:48 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-07 17:50 ` moeller0
2016-04-07 18:05 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-07 20:36 ` Aaron Wood
2016-04-08 11:51 ` Richard Smith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57079B37.4050008@gmail.com \
--to=smithbone@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=woody77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox