From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F723CBA8 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:51:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c6so87859284qga.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=60QPKUDB9e9IuGIuPWINVhneLug/KgAEXByNc/e6NnE=; b=Tt7aK/ZQRWoqLSYPaAYJrB7zFJbNF4zIoc3Ip6XrJLaQ1NnqBF6ApOegx/o3rvu1gq CROrzpscswl/LQVQ/wNlhru7gd+bdvsMgTyH/6f15t8XguOLEEcd/nvBhKQ57rrW07vc ejYRboHWNoO22BtagTUuonQr3UmEjW3WttLc2PWCPX66CDPbnbetLt6GcICuXrJBzi7W Dzik5idzQMlmrh0QlZHZldRLXgZo1cQbvzjMNEiN09XPbhIA/8Gc3/S7N8P0emqAbr4T sI87e9gafOwvt463hPp6lInfayllpYLF/LfvqzvBbYepF5CI6AYGkweEXPHTyQiIumUo R/WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=60QPKUDB9e9IuGIuPWINVhneLug/KgAEXByNc/e6NnE=; b=OMFFDYWKsmvU+a1I3k4NrQPcooyuwTbSMihNl+L3fjp3BShhDuYa/Q92zTrVK663lS Oe/EuyrvA29tCTWF6o8A0vRyQH9kjTtqy/EyB2onmA1fiLBY4nK+KbcOXRrNwFYQX0Ac 3Y8Aq9S6321pF+h50lzzrpZaz1O7vsOLO+POFBFFmzLFtygONoeKBLDHfWLoE1dlvARH M0XqESUFjvIQoz6IxpjvxslFVo7EO3cGagC5nQ9GUtFiIY4rBpa7IYpYVpfWZ4cxD4DN evkAVryHMwSYRrqBwNhfPc51AKwhmvPT1JgOVwBSAAVHFRVun628eSOFbfF61vbFeb/q qRXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKgTSmYqJQZYQQ7Gk+P8iu6DdpeZeUAajZ8yEj8HR2h/v3ntL0mdCBHDlatf/MrqQ== X-Received: by 10.140.194.67 with SMTP id p64mr11183028qha.19.1460116280605; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (c-24-61-11-132.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.61.11.132]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c62sm5329417qge.24.2016.04.08.04.51.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:51:19 -0700 (PDT) To: Aaron Wood , moeller0 References: <57066793.5050608@gmail.com> Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" From: Richard Smith Message-ID: <57079B37.4050008@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:51:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:51:21 -0000 On 04/07/2016 04:36 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > Or I can't read properly... I have the first gen wrt1900ac. Dual-core > 1.2GHz arm. The 1900acs is 1.6Ghz. However remember my results are all local with no cable providers in the way and thus no buffer bloat so even if the hardware was the same. I'm not sure they compare apples-to-apples with your tests. It does however suggest that this box can run the higher complexity algorithms and still maintain a lot of bandwidth. > Is this stable enough for full-time usage (as a home router)? Dunno. Currently on my network its a secondary device. It's behind my primary NAT off on its own network. It's stayed up 16d 11h so far with me running the wired flent tests and with a few phones and tablet devices connected to it but I would not call it very well used. Not sure when I might try and swap it in over the WNDR3800. Messing with the stable network makes the SO unhappy. :) -- Richard A. Smith