From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2203B25E for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:04:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r184so24811552qkc.1 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:04:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D6Cnd69WHWFwJSZ5h54duROosj6NtYOEhjlL8R+mt3A=; b=oNuxb9T5f22mkC2LpJUjN4+azc3LvF2ThKaJwjyYdemHa//aC5ed6fY+vxJKpUg4yY qZzpK701bNDE9RIhIh2gcW2eoVlUar5VODfT9v3cyWvId+lx9iV0XOu90Ro3iqAOuwh9 9fyXDc3xJOva6xKEaVPaEKfIvuUWSxBoCdn87o2KehmtJMHXstvQI6U29icEXFR2xYgX 31MAaFfGQTyC+jP9VqfucBHKTdrzCB0/6kN25oq7cRrYjvrRJygJ9P9bPpaYXZFYB0ap MHMtXNjcSAJUoTrKo9F72e/UvUkujxElJ5AjHMcORVDa1cO6WPSWkmr/oqvrxFrmEqNk NbPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D6Cnd69WHWFwJSZ5h54duROosj6NtYOEhjlL8R+mt3A=; b=N7XaFya41YFywlPLetbeSowyfl1g+zbjPFRUV2Pps5VWHpPt2HvzvBnwUEi+q3KmnX 1DkyLnHKb0jZuaLA33Wfpf+L9QnjwWwA1b458ZFstNylwc4thDYSa+C/nuE1N8+BJYPY c75zPkB20gj506ksISubNK5U+SrFcKH3SeQ+8CQtELkJg9x0ZWDCGLyuK7fS1DY2f2to nC2KqoOuBC8UzNYWkKRCHEtVP6j+yHyKgqMdH+8zo7UWPplPEfxVksSHS936m6X2pbsv 3ZJBnn6wHFgt8k1KqaCIF1I+iiTVGxhPIWwvOrN90dkOeI5gAAuW/gWUqNhWbdPJNgb9 BIKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXjQfp/JB5Cmr/FNuKPTnyvgrwr49M2MpR53GBEOMC4kASKsP7LyVI/EKl4XEQX5w== X-Received: by 10.55.178.198 with SMTP id b189mr10604283qkf.98.1461794660528; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.200.102.144] (207-180-163-172.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.172]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r136sm1838179qke.46.2016.04.27.15.04.19 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Richard Smith Message-ID: <57213763.7030602@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:04:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bugs using the 1200ac as a target X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:04:21 -0000 On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > it has something deeply wrong in it at a gbit. In this test I'd failed > over to a faster link at a gigE to show WTF it does - one flow totally > wipes out the others. > > http://blog.cerowrt.org/flent/failing_over_faster/linksys_1200_majorly_headblocking.svg What's your test conditions? I'll duplicate the test on my 1900acs and see if it's there as well. -- Richard A. Smith