From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995983B260 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 13:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f92so72024187qgf.0 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 10:03:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FzM6I56nDfhyTyU5ftNOSHathjIcYkNaeIIBeQ7IOW4=; b=LMeEEIsEBIF+O7k3ZJL0trzwvCTYXTcWbNvi3Prqe0vNWXQ3KqlWbxE5TLvICpU1ot zTL9+GTd8yZGx8s6e3clAKnQCx3OwL+WUPV356o2ruEjbS6e7F97kNdFBQdfDZCh3G0M BZB29BsGNCb/FeH19org//KbkE4Q94Cx1ZatFmaw5urJ9ANPjHMKVcIBzh3HUlori5JR yqnqqX7IWfIYJOHTVxO+8UmnR2A0sEhtfLTtHv9qLMYMpoRUtkH/8UyDNp51QM/kd5iV B9AvR+wjL2ftnsGr4V7bJQ3X4rNfFy5vFWoYVrwAUaWjRC3aoq4q2ZWL7jnOc3WMctZc O78w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FzM6I56nDfhyTyU5ftNOSHathjIcYkNaeIIBeQ7IOW4=; b=lH2FSA8bV4SqPzLU8+8E9/iSsiShDoD3cGPbyrImx4f1ye3hHZP7On6VzQF0dEbnOY 2e/RHYSKX4uDrjellUZvc3ufwSh+UiYpn3FgM0QRo1Rcx+MT8m3yHo2h0QMO2wVe+865 RE3tuIZ3HZS2w6+y2zZh6P7+uUldymtw92VGNOtVb9AzDIEKJiDXotAGLn5SNkFhkvQ3 wMnhDjcZq5FZMD1Jl/Svw2vKCxev/tJx+JUdP+qkIMd9LmbdgYdQiUHqQDGV3uYKEJ/f dCEY8khx6eQZDOZCP4W8mZ8huOp1CLpqUL354u+WUd5GRBBpjy1YhLLRaEweDyKqL+8a /rCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVMM6YvEvGW3m15n8SrqxQP3i/fJEbet63ilMWpNJVYr5yoBIYXYJPVwI1WvvYsYw== X-Received: by 10.140.93.67 with SMTP id c61mr32861194qge.101.1462208633361; Mon, 02 May 2016 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.100.0.215] ([96.84.219.81]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d12sm9346512qhd.13.2016.05.02.10.03.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 May 2016 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Dave Taht References: <57213763.7030602@gmail.com> Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" From: Richard Smith Message-ID: <57278877.9030207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:03:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bugs using the 1200ac as a target X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 17:03:54 -0000 On 04/27/2016 06:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > run netserver on the router. It doesn't seem to matter what qdisc is > on the router. > > hit it with the flent rrul_be or rrul tests. (or just multiple netperfs) > You'll see one flow completely take over the router in this case and > the others starve. The behavior of my 1900acs is different but still not very good. Seems to be a mix of total fail on the Tx side (ie no data reported) to what looks ok but much slower than 1Gbit. https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-P0wCbNmKvATHNKb3RjbVoxXzA&usp=sharing -- Richard A. Smith