From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 199C621F1B1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e9so3694254qcy.25
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=219o5+EuA19K6s1qhrKg+/L1Ft6ZLI+SyIC1E0pgK6I=;
	b=1DGNG52D1jRsrjKRwmlqhoBhzv/Hog78mSOHn+F9s1HkXGzc4rzv2kBgRvcZRMeBi/
	Gk1ooTSmIIvpXaPaCrsbaiOUoPr9L1uudidFCcnQh7fM8Nn/+P05sKP5mHUjBdZPsZem
	nEFhW2lPdZBPfAX1rrucus1DTTcTAlGzPBvzQrYgyLUICCk0UrMkwdGTZImtt1IsYGac
	I3fSWMka5RsDfllqK4UjYkcZGg1XXThhw9EuhBGVwf1aDvVqwpKb9AdfzdDBdOJbvi63
	vXhh5LtGcPiIJ/onengnhq4xA82u9pp21ry+MRHjR59X78lDricgl4tneTACMArP7lgI
	ZAWQ==
X-Received: by 10.49.62.3 with SMTP id u3mr24023239qer.6.1382379763973;
	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:8a63:1:5a7:6f05:db5:cf99?
	([2001:470:8a63:1:5a7:6f05:db5:cf99])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm40568855qas.5.2013.10.21.11.22.43
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4y6UYXt9+wi_U+9sQNq75GgqWzsK8X4F=CQO4Jv6DQZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:22:41 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C0F1F9B-CFCD-4BF7-9EE7-55874C766756@gmail.com>
References: <934A7998-2B4A-401D-A19C-B2FD67CFFF11@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw4y6UYXt9+wi_U+9sQNq75GgqWzsK8X4F=CQO4Jv6DQZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt: "Wireless is disabled or not
	associated" using channel 40 or 48 for 5GHz radio
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:45 -0000

On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> You can't do this in HT40+ mode, which bonds together two adjacent
> channels (36 and 40, 44 and 48), but can't do a channel in the middle
> (40 or 48)
>=20
> If you want to use 40 or 48 you can downgrade to HT20 mode (which is
> limited to 150Mbits)
>=20
> Yes there should be some sort of error check for this. I note 802.11ac
> is different, allowing bonding non-adjecent channels.

AHAH!  So it's supposed to work this way.

You're right - it would be good for the web GUI to enable only the =
channels that make sense for the particular HT mode shown in the =
Advanced Settings. Thanks.

Rich=