From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B686208A7C
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hms-beagle.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZCQ8-1YRZDa3thU-00Kxmw;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:46:26 +0100
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63C60796-0C39-474C-B5A4-F2FCACC4592A@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:46:24 +0100
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:d+Cmqk4iylw45lOBay4v9q57pXCQzrEadB3OjzcefkYXdBhDe1M
	onV5Ik7rmjnmqfIquAFxs5sTqroAdIvucDGl0KFkApD8qxi0V/ujg8qOnm3K5Ohq2T5+4iR
	FdII/Ue0TxahAhu+DtljV1f49mjYQn7s2UgLIx1XF27/ArH/I1EO22VCJmFmPCH7T8u6Xig
	8Q+fuBBHsm/o71msoo2Rg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] another contender for WNDR replacement
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:46:59 -0000

Hi List,
the following might just be what we need to replace the WNDR as a =
hig(er)-speed capable traffic shaper:

=
http://www.fit-pc.com/web/products/specifications/fitlet-models-specificat=
ions/?model%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-B+%28TBA%29&model%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-X+%28TBA%29&mo=
del%5B%5D=3Dfitlet-i+%28TBA%29

The entry level model fitlet-B is estimated at $129 (requires ram and =
msata), no information about the more interesting fitlet-i (2 GE ports). =
The AMD Jaguar SoC is supposedly more powerfull then the AMD G series =
T40E in the pc-engines api-1d ( http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1d.htm ) that =
was not that hot network wise ( =
http://planet.ipfire.org/post/pc-engines-apu1c-a-review ). Improvements =
include twice the L2, slightly faster DRAM, slightly tweaked core, an =
potentially =93turbo=94 up to 1.6Ghz from 1GHz base, intel GE chip i211 =
with BQL support. Downside the intel AC wifi card most likely will not =
allow proper tweaking (so maybe not suited for the make-wifi-fast =
project)
	So most likely this thing will also not be able to do SQM/Cake =
at 300Mbps combined or better. Would it not be sweet to finally be able =
to =93retire=94 the wndrs=85

Best Regards
	Sebastian