From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6744321F2CF for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mr4.cc.vt.edu (mr4.cc.vt.edu [198.82.164.236]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s56GCtws027662; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:12:55 -0400 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr4.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s56GCoo7025181; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:12:55 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2001:468:c80:2103:797c:c2c5:83f2:d30b]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s56GCowc009100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:12:50 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1402071170_2008P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:12:50 -0400 Message-ID: <6835.1402071170@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr4.cc.vt.edu Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Secure ad-hoc interface X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:13:58 -0000 --==_Exmh_1402071170_2008P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700, Dave Taht said: > Not clear what you mean. adhoc doesn't work with wpa, so far as I know.= I'm not even sure what it would *mean*, given the administrative model implied by WPA and the admin model implied by adhoc.. > I HAVE long thought that shipping with wpa enabled on the main interfac= es > was probably a good idea, but what I'd like in that case is to mandate = that > the wpa keys, ssid, and root password be changed on first install, actu= ally. That's actually a Really Good Idea. --==_Exmh_1402071170_2008P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBU5HogQdmEQWDXROgAQJG2w//Q5DVIg4adhj0BSH2pawBy/0Iqs4qom6s OYRWx8BZinrkYWxNyBK0SirhCokf/vjkPmbE7bsldrcDA+4AjODnx4WlxgTl8oxq xZI+emnI046Y+NyvVc4UWr5Ey+m3N4pKsJt2pY7R1eAXrn56emWpKD31d62F747b 2urk1vJ/jFWng8Cab1oQ5Mc+MLzXJ3/aSfMpCPeHo4c4MHqeBtMtDbiATnbxmgjm LNAh1oulUiCu6iRujutSskQZQ0UEq7i4gMP5vR+gi47JM/e7xmt7uv4bDe/AT+6I ZBkRjyIni9stQ4FCEtr5gT43/OPSOWAZCeOguuYZTC7HMhWGt3mGxitx3pMbSdq7 IC9En6ji2VGX11kLuyX61r3C4+Xsr+KmQDxGyRMtg7Ae0rYIT4IykVmGOJ5okAv8 tSKST7PHKjUokGTo/Ay/peZv+BFW5uVaCVBIA9bkdfWlvMONi3Ybey8luS9DROpN 8yUVlRy3aBj5PDdy9gjAdVMId6JXoUmLaWTnjUh01wzQix31Z2WB/NeEmYC6/b4D rFyhZBUeg/qKYZ7kcSuCLJpwr5cH+FJrKRlrX0Z6Z9nACgLwb6TUAcr7+fC4wxyo gMlISzunRQR0TjHi2nvTQtiBf4VH26PUn2vhxtE+lTOkZbEjO8U4CEtOrnokTr7k rb5zm2tUTTc= =7VQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1402071170_2008P--