From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5B321F1E6 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 1so818604qec.32 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:15:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+u5mD7o6Robmg8r1TNVRKreHuaM7qzr6Zk5bg69a8uo=; b=qqL9oKObHWLDw8P2i9Rptr4n70L/D+ld9fGW3D6LmLh0h7NHxeKn9+T5sbAR1dwuiE wZy1iyt67aIEpFFuNgAixtww9tb+KH7ZYS3LUz6u9MEs5+5tqmKtQVG3Ny4hH7z0Bw6g oUE3GsZcekiqWE2YbyqvXQj1EB4/A7FOcVuikPlcVi+vw4j369gLSYU6BvgdZ6KJmXN3 HTRbFuntPLuF5LBZRXCe8Ibs3phe+utrx0kLMizW6isDGNz4vQ9N35Ou8KcMaWOAIJR1 UEtVgZsWZgL7RnEX26rYYXgoWRwkY3zgcNb4WM6xxjVPNfKobuVFjvYBwrlZ8xwI1KEV hzIQ== X-Received: by 10.224.26.143 with SMTP id e15mr28679660qac.3.1390230927054; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-2114.home.lan ([64.223.225.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t10sm1245831qef.23.2014.01.20.07.15.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:15:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:15:26 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6D274821-F312-49DB-BA76-995A6FBC1F98@gmail.com> References: To: Maciej Soltysiak X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release/replacement router X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:15:39 -0000 On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Maciej Soltysiak = wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Dave Taht = wrote: >> ** The wndr3800 is obsolete and fixing the next generation soon would = be good > On wndr3800 being obsolete... I was asked recently for a router = recommendation. > I wanted to say WNDR3800, but do we have anything better that is still > that hackable? The WNDR3800 is still about $100 on Amazon today (in the US). If someone = wants to install it this week, it's a good deal. It's eminently = hackable, it has an astonishing development team that has really = addressed home networking, and they can get the benefit of all that now. >> But this past christmas everything was 802.11ac, running on arm. The >> ath10k is out and getting some love, too. > We still don't know the specs of WRT1900AC, do we? I received an initial response from Linksys, who said that they were = busy taking care of the details after the CES show. They promised to = have someone get back to me who could speak to the technical details. It's the MLK holiday here in the US, so they are probably not working. = I'll ping them tomorrow. > Best regards, > Maciej Rich=