From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B9721F783; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w7so3801609lbi.15 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2UN4hFNLb2YQvB0kdTQJbMWQcS26IjLDFziiuDCvUyU=; b=XFaDFEWfy4njucvtktP00BjgUA8DW2tmFDCqghS5uE5NxURapdXTuUe/Bpfl5ISX9V YpmEw9eW94yDGzN3AxVlbkPVbpTldu8xUBFA8fzc3Wxs07gNg3Xt6GYlkF20aI3Os18N KLMm7Mzzu6xzRQNpsgJFx/E5fMxfps/0NH4cvDNaun2mN5ijpOzvmXsZDZ24Pv8mjnyS PWsmXq4vx1Koi0hOTBzkPvDV+6ugM33Zg2DFm/3YfaEE2dukVDftlVU8FitpWs8EmHmw NHUuvoGcqLGeavU1jeYJXUK2Fn7VBMYHFboRj2ohxVe6XoDxdU1V3XhMGWMRFksdvoP/ 087w== X-Received: by 10.152.5.42 with SMTP id p10mr1938559lap.82.1409397279635; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (188-67-224-93.bb.dnainternet.fi. [188.67.224.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lg9sm1674549lab.25.2014.08.30.04.14.38 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:14:34 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E57A657-7683-4EC6-A16B-BF1E8B2124E4@gmail.com> References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: cerowrt-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels -> WNDR3800 can't cope... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:14:42 -0000 On 29 Aug, 2014, at 9:06 pm, Dave Taht wrote: > In the future, finding something that could be easily implemented in = hardware would be good. Does "implemented in firmware for a tiny ARM core" count? I imagine = that NICs could be made with those, if they aren't already, and it would = probably make the lead-time shorter and engineering risk smaller. - Jonathan Morton