(sent to incorrect email address, again) Begin forwarded message: > From: Sebastian Moeller > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL > Date: 13 August 2013 19:53:45 BST > To: Fred Stratton > Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" > > H Fred > On Aug 13, 2013, at 17:28 , Fred Stratton wrote: > >> I have been experimenting with the two sets of modified sets of scripts and AQM panels. Thank you for constructing them. > > Thanks for testing... > >> >> To mention the string ''for ATM choose' is repeated erroneously in the extended panel. > > Fixed… I will try to test whether it actually works before sending the next version... > >> >> The scripts work. >> >> The link layer giving best results is ethernet. > > What and how did you measure? Using "use HTB's private mechanism for linklayer and overhead" or "Use tc's stab mechanism for linklayer and overhead"? A little browsing of the kernel source makes me believe that the HTB version is fully busted and will not do anything at all (so I would have imagined adel atm and ethernet to behave the same). I am thinking about how to test whether a link layer adjustment works or not. > > >> Pinging severs whilst running Netalyzr has no effect. > > Not being a native english speaker cloud you be more explicit, please. Was the ping RTT affected by the concurrent netalyzr run (especially up- and download testing)? Did you get netsurf-wrapper to work on ubuntu? > > >> >> The tone buckets of the phone signal are translated into ATM packets by the DSP in the 2 Wire 2700. I have no idea what this closed source BSD implementation does to the packets before they are sent to CeroWRT. > > > >> >> I am using 3.10.2-1, as I cannot get the latest version to install with sys upgrade. > > So 3.10.6-1 fails with sysupgrade? > > > best > Sebastian > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >