From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D06F21F3A5 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 04:08:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([91.50.101.138]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNIi1-1XgmEL3Brl-006zJW; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 13:08:32 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 13:08:31 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7049B3A5-A857-4168-B718-F7903EBFDFD3@gmx.de> References: To: leetminiwheat X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qxexFcD8+Zm06Tij6PLBuDm/dPQ2S8/ALYBSJm0FxIMCJfdg/+I nDvgFEsR7OLngX12E8H2qbapdwx+EEfalvw+3aP0dMHSEUadQ1jfdsOuFpQJJQvaOif61OS OvruBHidj4DVbBQW/ssP3TdV4W9m6jxpZ5TeJuPUYchZu6nCrSiTwsRqgx4ndVQOHXotmGh TzC7e7ejC6Y167wnojp6A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how's everybody's uptime? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 12:09:06 -0000 Hi leetminiwheat (nice handle by the way ;) ) On Nov 6, 2014, at 16:45 , leetminiwheat = wrote: > 3.10.50-1 uptime/stability report: >=20 > using as primary gw router for a few months now. primary net usage: > gaming, and routing net to cable TV boxes via FiOS provided MoCA > router as secondary router. >=20 > # uptime > 10:11:56 up 20 days, 20:09, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 >=20 > nothing strange in dmesg or logread. (though logread only goes back so = far.) >=20 > memory usage in htop seems consistent between 27MB and 28MB, no memory = leaks. >=20 > sw00/sw10 WiFi performance has been good on both fronts for 2.4ghz and > 5ghz. I run a WiFi hotspot on gw00. no sign of bug 443 >=20 > had to reboot before this due to SQM bug, bandwidth limiting stopped > working on guest ingress presumably due to many SQM restarts and/or > wifi channel fiddling. Also recall odhcpd going out of control with > CPU usage about 2 months ago or something. still have to figure out > some way to limit max connections for guests so they can't saturate my > network even with badnwidth limiting, firewall packages seem to lack > support for what I'd need. I have 6 IFB interfaces right now though, > any way to clean these up? Maybe the following will work (repave $CUR_IFB with the IFB you want to = get rid of) tc qdisc del dev $CUR_IFB root followed by: ip link delete ${CUR_IFB} type ifb Hopefully that should do the trick. I am curious which SQM you are using = stock from cerowrt 3.10.50-1 or an updated version? We tried to fix the = spurious IFB generation and should be in much better shape now, only = leaking IFBs if either run.sh or stop.sh do not execute fully. I would = love independent confirmation that the fixes actually work=85=20 >=20 > mdns responder (avahi-daemon) seems to be working with iPhone to > Windows 8.1, though iPhone needs to be rebooted for WiFi sync to work > every darn time. Unsure if iPhone bug or Windows bug or avahi bug. > seems to advertise all services fine when I checked from a linux box. >=20 > not using ipv6, though @ge00 and odhcpd is enabled still. GW10 and > babel disabled. gw00 guest/bandwidth limited, and ge00 limited just > below ISP cap. all fq_codel. How well does that work in practice? (Can you effectively shape = to more than 60Mbps combined over all directions and interfaces = concurrently?) Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > Other additional packages I run: > -OpenSSH client for socks5 proxy ssh session to a remote server w/ > screen for lower latency gaming tunnel. (se00) > -Miau for IRC bouncer. > -dnscrypt-proxy server running locally to fetch encrypted dns requests > and serve locally 127.0.0.1:2053 to dnsmasq working great. I wish this > package would get pushed upstream, I think it's more secure than > DNSSEC. or possibly a combination of the two would be best. (still > unsure how to setup DNSSEC properly). >=20 > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Richard Weait = wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Dave Taht = wrote: >>> I have thus far been delighted in the stability of 3.10.50-1, how's = it >>> working for all of you? >>=20 >> I have to confess that I'm still using. 3.10.41-1 on two devices. >> up 30 days on one >> and 39 days on the other >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel