From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7AC21F180
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon,  6 Jan 2014 12:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hms-beagle-3.home.lan ([217.254.130.56]) by mail.gmx.com
	(mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MePYV-1VlCtN17U7-00QCDI for
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:44:30 +0100
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72F927D9-2B96-47F3-B01F-9083CB9C3325@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 21:44:29 +0100
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 
	Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VE7xyyKKU0RJBd9OJ2+vgAf5piReBhUMmQglqR46Ec/cgj7+A9i
	qG2UNDQh3trkTK7noNmjlpfFR3jhwylwL/2chrfI1Ym8IpiHOVgEJ8F0zD6NxLUAHn//QsA
	rOyifm9vMZkC6ajIQyETmDpQC9cDZqML4lk3bzwkEAmNVSpYWVRn7HmpLAE3qPaPtz/byUQ
	nPzZ7FB6XGBRczevAMmkQ==
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] regarding ECN
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:44:38 -0000

Hi Rich,

I had a quick look at the current state of the page and I really like =
what you created there.
I noticed that for ECN you argue:

> For the Download (inbound, ingress) link, we recommend you turn ECN on =
so that CeroWrt can inform the local receiver that it has detected =
congestion without losing a packet.

	We might want to argue for ingress that the packet has travelled =
most of its path already, dropping it would require some timer to expire =
while marking with ECN will get the congestion "throttle back" signal =
faster to our end point and hence allow our systems to react to =
congestion more promptly.

best
	sebastian=