From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7405321F44C for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mr5.cc.vt.edu (mr5.cc.vt.edu [198.82.141.27]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6J04hpl012152; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:04:43 -0400 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr5.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6J04bpw005189; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:04:42 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2601:8:1f80:663:adfe:85c3:e4f3:a14e]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6J04aWm009846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:04:37 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: David Lang In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:20:28 -0700." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1405728276_2017P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:04:36 -0400 Message-ID: <7415.1405728276@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr5.cc.vt.edu Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fastpass: A Centralized "Zero-Queue" Datacenter Network X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:05:21 -0000 --==_Exmh_1405728276_2017P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:20:28 -0700, David Lang said: > not to mention the scalability issues in trying to get that info to a central > point so that it can compute the N! possible paths for the data to take, along > with the data from all the other systems to pack them most efficiently into the > avilable paths. OK, so it converges slower than BGP. But at least it's not subject to wedgies. :) --==_Exmh_1405728276_2017P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBU8m2EwdmEQWDXROgAQIW1g/9GjtZEHxtrzbxmwMtYTZZzXJYriHf0v9o T/GURCZxlRXX7kUXb5C2dmQzIkSH5f0yjmM9iC2E4hJTGYhzqRbZ29/pdAS1zR7F kPvejiBCyZSqPdmAN2o+S2rUbM3x81EKODby6qdnOnrcFmnVsWnwZk9Vnl3MZE4/ kpAgcbqyQC91Qe0MHVx7PtHpBHKHtGMOSHgh5xV05KLQ9DHukBj+cFRUmeB5JFLR ql3MpBWlg3332/pCUtRlnqpC605AmHqux2hRGMnoBiS7TvV9dL8rXTsDYwQxnJ5B fLTmH8HzaikPFe8VgltCSxfNkhfX+pU+FAuvA42n36TzFdQxAWaXe4fZIz0r65a0 MLBQJcXNbub38WlTk9+24n51FJrOSAnDUrqC7wgHQHEKuVem6Z+FyAK8Tbpp9bHH mWwcjQ2WJ8vVBxxuOSMO/YUGhhdMsVtFrOYTIk4ulGzA87j3gnFx8gAzX7vC20gz K2/ekNsf2eNDlCUl1aqITQVdHWSGfj+A5waPxgFEUGpOu6d/0w1O/f49tlJb8s1f SER/H2YHo9R3L5I4Fxwdt4vilvsYH2gwh/KhOQ9iJgnlkHo+xS1j8OOUv3tALjHv Tz7Nw2eg5Hw6JVp2AYu20T0gf1PvRL0OlxUyVynRorO+kDmSbvGKvRYzyuXODIlj R/xOeyGellw= =jU0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1405728276_2017P--