From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::5]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C4C20029B for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 05:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web30g.yandex.ru (web30g.yandex.ru [95.108.253.239]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BD46F1041E0F; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:35:10 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1341318910; bh=iv188AFHFY6JQne1yOzq8ZNfFa0h+XpWJoreJ74LTGo=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=XsXPulhcOuA1WjxikE80Bfkbz2pXW6yrtRRj5ardH4nFiwn7FVf9yWXBaqHYufWQY a5zioUdNM+rZVtlGv/l8Qhg+CKfTZodd9xFRRL+4nGNypOeNhbb68eLM9DhyygGt3h nn2MySC5YF2W0fMlhgEuRZ7wMDDbDJIuAGXsC7c4= Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web30g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 79F3C38A805C; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:35:10 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1341318910; bh=iv188AFHFY6JQne1yOzq8ZNfFa0h+XpWJoreJ74LTGo=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=XsXPulhcOuA1WjxikE80Bfkbz2pXW6yrtRRj5ardH4nFiwn7FVf9yWXBaqHYufWQY a5zioUdNM+rZVtlGv/l8Qhg+CKfTZodd9xFRRL+4nGNypOeNhbb68eLM9DhyygGt3h nn2MySC5YF2W0fMlhgEuRZ7wMDDbDJIuAGXsC7c4= Received: from dhcp-217-131-wifi.yandex.net (dhcp-217-131-wifi.yandex.net [213.180.217.131]) by web30g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:35:10 +0400 From: Denis Ovsienko To: cerowrt-devel In-Reply-To: <458481341303008@web7d.yandex.ru> References: <2187151341044351@web9d.yandex.ru> <7isjdcpm1q.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <40851341093226@web25d.yandex.ru> <7ik3yoz7p2.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <1521341229978@web13h.yandex.ru> <206861341262491@web23d.yandex.ru> <458481341303008@web7d.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <751571341318910@web30g.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:35:10 +0400 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Cc: babel-users Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] switching cerowrt to quagga-babeld issues X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:35:13 -0000 > Does anybody know where this difference comes from? The difference comes from NetworkManager. Its efforts in reproducing high-metric RTPROT_KERNEL routes with low-metric RTPROT_STATIC ones are effectively hiding the kernel issue outside of CeroWrt runtime. Would it be better to add a watchdog shell script, which does the same, or patch the kernel? -- Denis Ovsienko