* [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review
@ 2021-03-10 20:09 Dave Taht
2021-03-10 21:44 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2021-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-03-10 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro
the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits
through sqm. the sqm-scripts
just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui...
the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on
it first time
the bad - innumerable gpl violations
the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it
at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't
work.
I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to
openwrt without fiddlin further.
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review
2021-03-10 20:09 [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review Dave Taht
@ 2021-03-10 21:44 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2021-03-10 22:09 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2021-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nils Andreas Svee @ 2021-03-10 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht, cerowrt-devel
Was kinda tempted to get one of those at one point, but seeing the
software problems with them I'm staying away. Although it could be a
nice OpenWrt box of course.
Ah yes the GPL violations. I've been asked about bringing both CAKE and
WireGuard to the UDMs, but with no sources there's not really anything
I can do (someone did get userspace based WireGuard working though).
When someone contacted UBNT support about it they responded with "We
don't have any plan to release the GPL source code for the UDM and UDM
pro yet".
I mean in EdgeMax land they might need a poke to release the archives
for a new firmware release, but they'll do it. For these however it's
been 8 months since that request and we've seen nothing.
Next time I'm in the market for new networking equipment I'm probably
not going to touch Ubiquiti again. I digged it back in the days
fq_codel was added into the firmware that we reminisced about, but
those times seems to be long behind us.
</rant>
--
Best Regards,
Nils
On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 12:09 -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro
>
> the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits
> through sqm. the sqm-scripts
> just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui...
> the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on
> it first time
> the bad - innumerable gpl violations
> the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it
> at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't
> work.
>
> I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to
> openwrt without fiddlin further.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review
2021-03-10 21:44 ` Nils Andreas Svee
@ 2021-03-10 22:09 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling @ 2021-03-10 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nils Andreas Svee; +Cc: Dave Taht, cerowrt-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2271 bytes --]
I was hoping the Lawsuit with Cambria would result in something.
tl;dr Ubiquity took cambria to court because the claimed they copied stuff,
cambria responded with their own litigation by saying Ubiquity wasn't
complying with GPL.
But they settled under NDA and we all lost out.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:44 AM Nils Andreas Svee <me@lochnair.net> wrote:
> Was kinda tempted to get one of those at one point, but seeing the
> software problems with them I'm staying away. Although it could be a
> nice OpenWrt box of course.
>
> Ah yes the GPL violations. I've been asked about bringing both CAKE and
> WireGuard to the UDMs, but with no sources there's not really anything
> I can do (someone did get userspace based WireGuard working though).
>
> When someone contacted UBNT support about it they responded with "We
> don't have any plan to release the GPL source code for the UDM and UDM
> pro yet".
>
> I mean in EdgeMax land they might need a poke to release the archives
> for a new firmware release, but they'll do it. For these however it's
> been 8 months since that request and we've seen nothing.
>
> Next time I'm in the market for new networking equipment I'm probably
> not going to touch Ubiquiti again. I digged it back in the days
> fq_codel was added into the firmware that we reminisced about, but
> those times seems to be long behind us.
>
> </rant>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Nils
>
> On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 12:09 -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> > I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro
> >
> > the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits
> > through sqm. the sqm-scripts
> > just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui...
> > the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on
> > it first time
> > the bad - innumerable gpl violations
> > the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it
> > at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't
> > work.
> >
> > I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to
> > openwrt without fiddlin further.
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3357 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review
2021-03-10 20:09 [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review Dave Taht
2021-03-10 21:44 ` Nils Andreas Svee
@ 2021-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-14 17:00 ` Dave Taht
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2021-03-14 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --]
Mikrotik wrote a queue discipline, labeled as GPL, but would not release
source.
That is why I don't ever recommend them
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:09 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro
>
> the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits
> through sqm. the sqm-scripts
> just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui...
> the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on
> it first time
> the bad - innumerable gpl violations
> the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it
> at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't
> work.
>
> I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to
> openwrt without fiddlin further.
>
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1840 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review
2021-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2021-03-14 17:00 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-03-14 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:32 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> Mikrotik wrote a queue discipline, labeled as GPL, but would not release source.
> That is why I don't ever recommend them
I can't recommend them either, but I am happy they at least are
beginning to ship
a new kernel with the right stuff in it. I imagine all their drivers
need BQL, though.
Another recent disappointment was the ubnt edgerouter 12, a very
incompetently implemented product. Tons of offloads, and I was unable
to get NAT to work in an
hour of trying.
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 12:09 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro
>>
>> the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits
>> through sqm. the sqm-scripts
>> just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui...
>> the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on
>> it first time
>> the bad - innumerable gpl violations
>> the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it
>> at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't
>> work.
>>
>> I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to
>> openwrt without fiddlin further.
>>
>>
>> --
>> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
>> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>>
>> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-14 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-10 20:09 [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review Dave Taht
2021-03-10 21:44 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2021-03-10 22:09 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2021-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-14 17:00 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox