From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14AC83CB35 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317643194; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:44:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:44:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lochnair.net; h= message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh= Iy4f0h+JYUXry/+bNT7uZj9TuauuroTGDTZyrDxywrs=; b=JHP1S2ELKqNEff7a 26oS6eERpcqH9mFy7539sgXw35X9h3OdR1VMuGjq6Q0bNjG8JMc8yVbHRHs9WCGL eDoEH4hvPUTRr3/6Tlrujfm824yU3yA5i9RSDC0xYR/hfzBsd3xis4/sZV4/k24W Xh6KiNYkj6fK8t5jmEFnNd+/HI7y5e8C2b35AnvzIGzTpFUxllFsrB7KAo+A6tot MfViGg8hFapCOFrETF0da7eVnupkXMgae6gzPIhDs4WMlN5xiZUF/lbQMenPo5Vl /IiYNvqR3HTaJlNp7sXd3jj4r0tv2fH+VWhfyEh3l5vGzVruhUH7WR5z0IadzsSS oBB1sQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Iy4f0h+JYUXry/+bNT7uZj9TuauuroTGDTZyrDxyw rs=; b=uxmqOtfmWJaWAUs4THAITsEuJXjNiuULP+vSgPP9vloTDO3GLgyoj8X6z FsoVAbqYzOMCiQGy3UPpZauR3NtbL6KHrwkUQOSvUKjtuAwej71ZhmjcrwD4zLLn XKSsYS46TEQkKpAum5orLrewbacOkbJwuyfRAog+6AqHY73OBSEutAG9HxNTidT2 0yUdFHE9N5eRe5ngVoViFyCW2WDd5mfkdM6FxCCBxdEAR/Plsr5j2SsS43wzu10B gBiL7mZVljh1SvySh3WyB2k6OXTg++vWH3X2XnZrupXGPdxzsPLD5byBm87U6NqG RsSm/yZ4e8cawQkEJ8HbreoPAmeFQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddukedgudehvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkuffhvfffjghftggfggfgsehtjeertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefpihhl shcutehnughrvggrshcuufhvvggvuceomhgvsehlohgthhhnrghirhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieelheejleehudekheetteehkeffvdduheejteekkefgveetheeu ieeltdelveegnecukfhppedukeehrddujeehrdehiedrfedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgvsehlohgthhhnrghirhdrnhgv th X-ME-Proxy: Received: from [10.1.100.229] (gate.stokkdalen.net [185.175.56.31]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8DD724005A; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:44:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <797d57333ef504c724262aae5856d5dda54459d0.camel@lochnair.net> From: Nils Andreas Svee To: Dave Taht , cerowrt-devel Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:44:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] udm pro review X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:44:27 -0000 Was kinda tempted to get one of those at one point, but seeing the software problems with them I'm staying away. Although it could be a nice OpenWrt box of course. Ah yes the GPL violations. I've been asked about bringing both CAKE and WireGuard to the UDMs, but with no sources there's not really anything I can do (someone did get userspace based WireGuard working though). When someone contacted UBNT support about it they responded with "We don't have any plan to release the GPL source code for the UDM and UDM pro yet". I mean in EdgeMax land they might need a poke to release the archives for a new firmware release, but they'll do it. For these however it's been 8 months since that request and we've seen nothing. Next time I'm in the market for new networking equipment I'm probably not going to touch Ubiquiti again. I digged it back in the days fq_codel was added into the firmware that we reminisced about, but those times seems to be long behind us. -- Best Regards, Nils On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 12:09 -0800, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been fiddling with a ubnt udm pro > > the great - 4GB of ram, really fast cpus, can push a lot of bits > through sqm. the sqm-scripts > just worked but to make it truly functional at all you need the gui... > the good - galene videoconferencing server cross compiled and ran on > it first time > the bad - innumerable gpl violations > the awful - having to register the product online in order to use it > at all... and the registration process for a new account... doesn't > work. > > I have never been so tempted to just arbitrarily reflash a box to > openwrt without fiddlin further. > >