From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.36-6 released
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:18:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7AADF025-DEFA-4A21-8934-CB5188D1F882@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw455hU3H7E=rC2=+QhTV4vOtk1Hmd4HZ3QNBAnQ=Kq8Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
On Apr 21, 2014, at 21:09 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2014, at 22:01 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> + felix's wifi patch for bug #442 added
>>> please break wifi.
>>>
>>> + debloat qlens reduced again to 12 for be and bk wifi queues
>>> + heartbleed fix from -3 forward
>>>
>>> I note that nearly every "secured"-by-openssl network facing daemon has been
>>> shown vulnerable to heartbleed. The hole in openvpn bit *me*, in
>>> particular. I've updated, rekeyed and re-certified the vpns I have in
>>> place, and you should too for any openvpn servers and clients you have
>>> too.
>>>
>>> It was a real PITA for me, and I only had a few boxes on it.
>>>
>>> For more details, see: http://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/heartbleed
>>>
>>> For more details on the daemons potentially affected by heartbleed in
>>> cerowrt, openwrt, and others, see the advisory at:
>>>
>>> http://www.bufferbloat.net/news/50
>>>
>>> + resync with openwrt
>>> notably there were updates to netifd, and a fix for a strongswan CVE
>>>
>>> + dnscrypt added as an optional package (thx stephen walker and "mailjoe")
>>> + snort added as an optional package
>>>
>>> +/- full dnssec
>>> - upgrade to httping 2.x broke
>>> - no sqm auto tuning yet
>>
>> Note, all you need is to put the word "auto" (without the quotes) in the fields named:
>> Latency target for ingress, e.g 5ms [units: s, ms, or us]; leave empty for default, or auto for automatic selection.
>> and
>> Latency target for egress, e.g. 5ms [units: s, ms, or us]; leave empty for default, or auto for automatic selection..
>>
>> The bigger caveat is that the current implementation probably is not ideal and could need a bit of data guided optimization…
>
> And more eyeballs.
Oh, sure!
>
>> @Dave: if you think this is ready to be inflicted upon the greater cerowrt community I can see what is required to actually make SQM default to that behavior..
>
> Inflict away.
Great, I just pushed a number of changes reworking the handling of IFB devices (WIP, lightly tested not fully complete but saner than the previous hard coding). I also snuck in the change I believe to me the last missing piece to change the "default" behavior to auto.
How do I build an ilk packet from ceropackages? Then I could go and test a fresh install to see whether the committed changes actually chance the default ;). Oh and I do hope you have/will have a great vacation.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
>> Best Regards
>> sebastian
>>
>>> - neither snort nor dnscrypt tested
>>>
>>> If you are not experiencing problems with wifi or with heartbleed
>>> there are few reasons to update to this release.
>>>
>>> I wanted to note to those that use sysupgrade without a clean reflash,
>>> in that the
>>> /etc/opkg.conf file is not re-written in this case, and still points
>>> to the old repository.
>>> If you wish to install additional packages after an inplace upgrade,
>>> you will have
>>> to also update /etc/opkg.conf to point to the right place.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Täht
>>>
>>> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-21 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-19 20:01 Dave Taht
2014-04-20 7:37 ` Richard O
2014-04-21 19:10 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-20 20:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-04-21 19:09 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-21 19:18 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2014-04-21 19:42 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-21 21:34 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7AADF025-DEFA-4A21-8934-CB5188D1F882@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox