From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:56:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7B5DD5A3-D273-4708-909C-5B5D5DE72282@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7q+ja_pW0vT6x1TB2qHShXnEMY8RJbpP_FquZEWsMAig@mail.gmail.com>
HI Dave,
On Oct 19, 2014, at 20:24 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had
> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
>
> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start
> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell.
So on Hnymans community openwrt build a few fortunate ones on excellent lines seem to get decent results even at 110-120 Mbps combined:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=250989#p250989
and:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=251013#p251013
I have no idea why and both lines were reasonably well-behaved even without any AQM/QOS...
Also I wonder whether when we increase the quantum for higher rates to give HTB some breathing room, whether we also should increase burst and cburst? My hunch is that quantum affects the switching between the leaves, while busts and cburst should allow to dump more data to lower layers inside each leaf qdisc. And since we are running behind, maybe taking a bigger shovel can help some. (I assume this needs to be titrated not to kill latency under load, but if we can only effective have HTB execute x times per second we can easily afford to dump line-rate/maxHTB_iteratin_rate bytes per opportunity, no?) My own internet link is way to slow to test this...
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>> I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to the older
>> submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. But in my
>> search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen about
>> setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
>> wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizon fios
>> and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-19 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-19 17:51 Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:24 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 18:48 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:51 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 19:16 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20 1:08 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-20 8:11 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21 2:30 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-21 8:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-22 19:39 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-22 20:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-23 22:03 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-24 11:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-19 18:56 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2014-10-19 19:22 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 19:33 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:41 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAA93jw6DFxoDaRVCoQn=zxbOjgQ-dA1bCZ1W=p9br25jWrRgkg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-19 22:44 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20 20:04 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-20 22:48 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-21 3:35 ` Aaron Wood
2014-10-21 7:43 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21 7:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7B5DD5A3-D273-4708-909C-5B5D5DE72282@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=ernestogelias@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox