From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A1A21F22A for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x13so10305163qcv.19 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:15:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=b3SrRG4efMaOrXtjKQGO0zk08MQIH4BsLQGyX97P/hE=; b=MOzJ1+m+E+eQsLSSpypHYMj1BbTFnzMb/6MALwWwatFoq6BfvQZdpGCP85/8+vYVJD CGSgWWC6rHWgJe7jNRjOxoNuWdi3rmnHsMfRSWIRjXpevHWmw99h5ZHytgeBu4+dmRp+ MulrwY6B6xfuHDJHipGmXMvxd7kx1O4ghq8AEjPjsiDkIsnKspm8Rp53a1Ho/EvtpGn5 k6qQ8b8Oye5x59DFPLNMs8f4aHs+6SV97PhmPji5ty5RCCjcEitSKRQTebrOX7XPCFli oMatWiCfeCyOTiH68veZW2OfamrlUkYSqyUgMrKsBHVBe1f/ygiogdajRyk66Ljb3dDS Fn9g== X-Received: by 10.224.62.14 with SMTP id v14mr8738778qah.79.1392038102847; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-2666.home.lan (pool-71-241-217-5.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.241.217.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u20sm23663637qge.2.2014.02.10.05.15.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:15:02 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:14:59 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <805ACD4A-D738-4B84-AA28-855249D318F1@gmail.com> References: <87mwi18fl5.fsf@toke.dk> <20140209122259.261147e0@giga.billmerriam.com> <874n486rxe.fsf@toke.dk> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR alternative for higher capacity X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:15:04 -0000 On Feb 9, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > Rich Brown had contacted linksys. I don't know the current status. I pinged them in mid-January, and got back a "We're really busy right = now, but will get back to you soon..."=20 response. I will follow-up this week. > Dave T=E4ht also wrote: > So far we're not impressed with their follow through, or their > announcement, or their hardware. They seemed to think that merely > announcing they'd work with openwrt precluded things like, actually > contacting the openwrt devs to talk about their plans. This is the > rough equivalent of someone announcing a product that Apple would > support, without Apple;s actual endorsement. I will include this in my communication to see if they care about this = perception. Best, Rich=