From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] USB3 or HDMI ethernet? - Are wires dead?
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:08:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8381.1460995710@obiwan.sandelman.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw47yqrETEjC0w-5MFf+PA1q1FfP7LzEdG_zq2HtRMRX4w@mail.gmail.com>
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> But it asks a question - if basic wifi-only + compute has fallen so
> low, is ethernet dead? Every TV I've seen has both ethernet and wifi, I
> have no idea what percentage of real users are setting up ethernet vs
> wifi on them. (anyone?)
Ethernet is not dead for the reasons that wifi is bloated.
I know when my neighbours are watching their wifi "FIBE TV", because my wifi
tends to die. (I think they do 802.11g without backoff to 802.11b)
*My* "TV" (Wii, OUYA) are on wires for this reason.
I consider jamming their AP... I suspect that apartment dwellers will begin
to learn to use the wire.
> What I sort of hope for is that your TV could become part of the
> routing infrastructure in the house - *wired* - so you could attach
> more devices to it that wouldn't need their own connections...
I agree, it would be nice: the TV is big enough to put a pretty decent
antenna inside, and it's in the place where the people and devices are.
I personally didn't understand why TiVo didn't buy Skype ten years ago. TiVo
had simultaneous MP4 encode and decode and network; all it needed was a USB
camera on top of the TV, and it's a video phone.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-18 14:50 Dave Taht
2016-04-18 16:08 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2016-04-18 16:14 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-18 16:32 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-18 16:35 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2016-04-18 18:03 ` Aaron Wood
2016-04-18 23:10 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2016-04-19 17:51 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8381.1460995710@obiwan.sandelman.ca \
--to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox