From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Latest codel, fq_codel, and pie sim study from cablelabs now available
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 03:00:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86AA48E0-B5CD-4A94-AF2B-D75178E8C660@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51817A6F.1080006@superduper.net>
On 1 May, 2013, at 11:26 pm, Simon Barber wrote:
> Interesting to note that sfq-codel's reaction to a non conforming flow is of course to start dropping more aggressively to make it conform, leading to the high loss rates for whatever is hashed together with a VoIP flow that does not reduce it's bandwidth.
>
> One downside to SFQ really.
The only real solution, for the scenario where this happens, would be to somehow identify all the BitTorrent traffic and stuff it into a single bucket, where it has to compete on equal terms with the single VoIP flow. The big unanswered question is then: can this realistically be done? Does BitTorrent traffic get marked as the bulk, low priority traffic it is, for example?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 11:23 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2013-05-01 20:26 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Simon Barber
2013-05-02 0:00 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2013-05-02 2:20 ` Simon Barber
2013-05-02 4:59 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] " Andrew McGregor
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Jonathan Morton
2013-05-14 2:26 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] " Dan Siemon
2013-05-14 4:56 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Codel] " Tristan Seligmann
2013-05-14 10:24 ` Dave Taht
2013-05-14 13:02 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] " Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 18:19 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Codel] " Michael Richardson
2013-05-14 12:12 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-06 17:54 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-06 18:46 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-05-06 20:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-07 16:22 ` Greg White
2013-05-07 13:31 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Michael Richardson
2013-05-07 16:30 ` Greg White
2013-05-07 19:56 ` Wes Felter
2013-05-07 20:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-08 22:25 ` Dave Taht
2013-05-08 22:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-09 1:45 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] " Andrew McGregor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86AA48E0-B5CD-4A94-AF2B-D75178E8C660@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=simon@superduper.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox