From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD7D3B2A2 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:33:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.toke.dk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3200D43DD; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:33:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1479724386; bh=06cTZedE4W+fvWlXU1+ww2p7RlYoy5fjHUYj4MTprFU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Jpq6bz7OHsVe6kvlrre9/uv/fYUNr0muHlSPhOW2JmfxAk75bw77CQJBAKsPQUqFw QWo3rxPnLyKQzJs5wqBS+H66hbscICiI1pikECk/PkQfcOIBQwMAjYpmDuj2gZ250o Vf1JToAk2hXNsPGrBY6rQUinQl1ZqC4wLDN3BkZY8rTn6hmtp+bQec7DMXwB95hA0F 707rChgsmeOmdwWx5DOwpc0Qa/RAqhnTNsEIpfeTu+VgfrJ4ZgvsOb5uVsfoLGG4Zc UdvSF4OkdSACIECGDTeMMdCF2O+w/7shTiblU/mZchYqM2OGQvGmkt62MWSiPT70KT Er0G2cR3WqohA== Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CDF9C4016F; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:33:05 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht Cc: Marcin Wojtas , "cerowrt-devel\@lists.bufferbloat.net" References: <87polpsu6u.fsf@toke.dk> <87lgwdssrf.fsf@toke.dk> <87h971sr4h.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:33:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:22:01 -0800") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <871sy5xgv2.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: perf and BQL on the linksys 1200ac. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:33:09 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > Better, I guess, but still weird. Now two flows get started and a few > more get started sooner in a few more tests than those attached. > > Still, during the test I am basically locked out of getting in via a > new ssh until it completes. > > I guess the problem here is deeper than this, perhaps higher up the > stack? Not a clue. Maybe the switch is to blame? > Also, that it's "good" that it exists on the omnia to get more eyes on > it. Pls file bug there too? They already have it in their nightlies: https://github.com/CZ-NIC/turris-os/blob/test/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/900-mvnet-BQL.patch Sent a patch to the LEDE list. -Toke