From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60FE221F228 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:59:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-kau.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5626C49D30; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:59:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1392037169; bh=qI/Fj26etaxIXMAntq5PI4+7fvaumU20CPqs6A2ja00=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LyL36pp8mEvhqFkiypCdZiYTXCshinzLd87k/jXq1kzCBd7AydSPUgjDCZFKoDgnY JHpw5rxZFvyk+FdlCymZPIJOGjiCq2BVmtHZt6lq4C9UV2RmVGO+rx3z6HcQgzINoN RsOoAju8VuWe4QAriQAgV13BflajZevxApiYjMAg= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Simon Kelley References: <87a9e6xcae.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <87ob2lmqny.fsf@toke.dk> <52F29645.6010001@thekelleys.org.uk> <874n4dwcdb.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F2BA80.9010202@thekelleys.org.uk> <87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F369AA.5060809@thekelleys.org.uk> <8761osv78r.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F371B3.5030406@thekelleys.org.uk> <87k3d8mna8.fsf@toke.dk> <52F3A3B2.8020201@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppmw7ajj.fsf@toke.dk> <52F77349.40305@thekelleys.org.uk> <87lhxk78pa.fsf@toke.dk> <52F7EC3C.4060505@thekelleys.org.uk> <87bnyg55tp.fsf@toke.dk> <52F8BA64.2050401@thekelleys.org.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:59:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F8BA64.2050401@thekelleys.org.uk> (Simon Kelley's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:16 +0000") Message-ID: <871tzbgm36.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Testers wanted: DNSSEC. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:59:41 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Simon Kelley writes: > Great, thanks. I've done that and confirmed what you are seeing. At this point I > need to trace through the whole validation process in parallel on working and > broken platforms, to see where the two diverge. > (I've had to do this before. It was not fun, but it did produce results.) I've > installed gdb and can run dnsmasq under gdb, but the binary is very thoroughly > stripped, so I can't get any useful information out. Best way to get a > non-stripped dnsmasq binary on there? I've rebuilt the packages non-stripped; same links as before (warning, they're quite big now) :) -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS+M0tAAoJEENeEGz1+utPWukH/i60Ppce1cD3USXbd0imrl2e Ssv5rTAg2qkrr5qDRLKaEO3OiqocJFGHfXiRUXsG1YqWNuRtcGQZ2Dj/9HbdL04X TgswJ5w7vDPAKefsgifikCfQl6nucTo8OZ/+fAqL0I0CVeR4Gc2Oac2F50ej2Qbu Ty3JubPTu8P62/4ZUNkVvEwd1lw2Xqrk3Guo1U2T89pRogCnbxq4oJ6qbcreUDqj yZKwY7YRM3bxVGUzK5JluRNsfTky4wTrTjT+tu1cfVpRHNiyM8wKZQf57wLlR0Or nGjaW+bneZjll2ynHjqXjTKMQx9J+ISQbzgN9TjEwkROBiUUoNXGNoONLL0ncCA= =a5nf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--