From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Christopher Robin <pheoni@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:44:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u0aew48.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPjrEw9eOK47RjY=Av=Fg10DD_r7Nzds3coxw+WxtHHgh4hgmg@mail.gmail.com> (Christopher Robin's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:37:59 -0500")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3462 bytes --]
Christopher Robin <pheoni@gmail.com> writes:
> ***Are we here for research and development, or are we here for final
> implementation?
I've always thought about CeroWRT as an R&D project. As Dave points out
I don't think it's realistic to provide a "stable" release in the sense
of having it upgraded and maintained. At least not as things stand now.
However, designating a release as "stable" in the same way as the
previous one (i.e. something that won't crash and where most or all of
the advertised features (mostly) work) would probably be a good idea.
In particular, crash bugs and things that are completely broken should
probably be fixed?
As far as my installation goes:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/mips/unaligned_instructions
154737
# uptime
10:39:18 up 5 days, 10:56, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.04
# dmesg | grep "TX DMA"
[348064.371093] ath: phy0: Failed to stop TX DMA, queues=0x004!
# dmesg | grep "checksum failed"
[13551.957031] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[16072.535156] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[22734.054687] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[93252.820312] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[96253.570312] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[106396.003906] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[156808.253906] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[163650.000000] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[224205.101562] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[269216.191406] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[276718.035156] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[316807.695312] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[329890.929687] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[333792.148437] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[399208.269531] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[410070.828125] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[435757.078125] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[441458.539062] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
[449560.417968] ICMPv6 checksum failed [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 > 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
I've had to re-initialise the wifi a couple of times for no apparent
reason, and one or two reboots necessary, but nothing that major...
-Toke
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 6:07 Dave Taht
2014-01-14 8:37 ` Christopher Robin
2014-01-14 9:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2014-01-14 12:51 ` David Personette
2014-01-14 13:20 ` Rich Brown
2014-01-14 15:30 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 3:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-01-15 15:18 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-14 12:10 ` Juergen Botz
2014-01-14 15:10 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-14 12:36 ` David Personette
2014-01-15 4:11 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAMybZqzs9ES9G23ke-PjU759wxbQNMytYa4EHmv0H8HqpPwwPQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-15 14:47 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-15 0:30 ` David Lang
2014-01-15 17:31 ` Jim Reisert AD1C
2014-01-20 15:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2014-01-20 15:15 ` [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release/replacement router Rich Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871u0aew48.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=pheoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox