From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-12 released
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:36:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738iat48q.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D237658-E6E9-4985-AAFD-8A87256E1D77@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:23:59 +0100")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]
Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:
> I thought a bit about this, and I think there might be a way to use
> the available widgets in a way that emulates consistency ;) (well at
> least in theory) If the first entry would not hog the singleton entry
> field with the add button, but would spawn a new empty field with an
> add button, while the just entered (and saved & applied) entry would
> be followed by the delete button, he whole thing would be consistent
> enough to not confuse the user. I will see whether I can implement
> that in the luci code.
Cool; FWIW, I think it's the javascript you need to look at :)
-Toke
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-22 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 17:47 Dave Taht
2014-03-21 18:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-21 22:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-21 22:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-21 23:04 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-21 23:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
[not found] ` <608F3E46-3D81-48A3-B60C-E90661DD3AB2@gmx.de>
2014-03-22 11:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-22 17:09 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-22 18:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-22 20:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-22 19:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-22 19:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2014-03-22 20:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-24 0:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-03-24 14:35 ` Jim Reisert AD1C
2014-03-26 4:37 ` Kai Yang
2014-03-24 16:32 ` [Cerowrt-devel] upnp oddness (was " Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738iat48q.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox