From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.tohojo.dk (mail.tohojo.dk [188.40.53.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E85A521F1EE for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (unknown [10.42.3.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tohojo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C85541EC0907; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:55:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E50E9F324; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:55:53 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Moeller References: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> <87vc5drhdj.fsf@toke.dk> <87bo75rgp5.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:55:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:32:07 +0200") Message-ID: <8738shrd0p.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:55:57 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Sebastian Moeller writes: > As far as I can tell at least VDSL typically means VDSL2 and that > probably means PTM instead of ATM. In essence this means you do not > have to deal with ATMs 48 payload bytes per 53 byte cell transport > inefficiencies. So all you need to deal with is per packet overhead. > Then again I am sure you probably know that already. (Sidenote, as far > as I understand (so not very far) using ATM for DSL connections with > POTS service in the lower frequency range never made much sense at > all, the 5 byte ATM header typically was constant and by that just > ballast and the 48 byte quantization on the last mile never came with > any benefits, but I digress) Right, thanks. So that means the overhead is constant per (ethernet) package? -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRviZWAAoJEENeEGz1+utP0IkH/2KKV0OQfRPdcduKzMGHF7yh YH1C7KqOc1dpj9j0Xu53i7zIFtVOExaoYZXHmkPa6E93qPzC+/FDF/4loOzmVILi Lb9k5q9fF8KiVqjOxVD9PcF1QR01l+Ae4bHzYkhxzyt2uRQOEdpJcw3EsI0sK2Zt Wde4sXTSydqjP9Gh9BnTbJktSvVq+F9AQ+jrzXPoPpYJyMYu699Gbj/hzA1OUVuq NQt/bnMC1idkIKjNIrqI9loPq3RRQdbBlOXZvmjDSYZillfZOUYddcG8w8pLQ7z9 AdRDg4CJxMla3DBI3MIDCs8Suezt0G8GemYmS+BrCKYmXhdLbRvA/LF3p9V+M84= =ySgq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--