From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Matt Taggart <matt@lackof.org>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Ubiquiti Launches a Speed Test Network
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874l1p25ka.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909061010210.21167@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, Matt Taggart wrote:
>
>> So an interesting idea but they have some things they could improve.
>
> I've been considering what one should run in parallel with the speed test
> to get an impression if the speedtest impacts performance of other flows /
> realtime flows, similar to what dslreports speedtest does.
>
> I've considered running one or several simulated voip calls (50pps) and
> record RTT, PDV, packet loss etc for this session.
>
> It would be interesting to hear any suggestions people have for a fairly
> simple codebase that does this that can be included in these kinds of test
> clients (both server and client end, and of course one that protects
> against reflection attacks etc).
>
> iperf3 can be used for this, but from what I can see the iperf3 server
> code isn't very friendly to multiple parallel tests or even resilient
> against hung clients that doesn't close the test nicely.
>
> I also considered using WebRTC or VoIP libraries, does anyone know what
> RTT/PDV/packet loss data can be extracted from some common ones?
Pete coded up this wonderful tool for UDP-based latency testing; it's
even supported in Flent, and available on some (all?) the public-facing
servers:
https://github.com/heistp/irtt
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 19:51 [Cerowrt-devel] " Matt Taggart
2019-09-06 8:15 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-09-06 8:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-09-06 9:56 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-09-06 12:18 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-09-06 17:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-06 18:33 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-09-06 22:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-06 22:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-09-06 23:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-07 11:33 ` Pete Heist
2019-09-07 12:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-09-07 13:09 ` Pete Heist
2019-09-07 13:47 ` Valdis Klētnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874l1p25ka.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=matt@lackof.org \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox