From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E4821F22D
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1430125317; bh=oBtfAUQwcN8+H2WcIN2iLzvRPVVS6vfZZtN8O18Xm3U=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=fWcPIbF9uty5L6AC8lqVlbSLmaPBsAZGMxo+Qr5oABI/2Y9vU1x5r92zL9/M4VO4m
	5DUHTUMpBQ4Jqpd16kKpkVfVb2D2I/mqXfnwL5q5+sn5bAuT4+kT0x2bfPOH9YQU1R
	qmTSFYWh8Er/Oa+3PC1u2CebwWFAK4RTIX6NYl0Q=
Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C3265C4026E; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
References: <CAA93jw60UN9UDtRR45QRdhbf5YO6RvkoB1qYn0=SknJPU5X8zQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<553DF3C7.2000301@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:01:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <553DF3C7.2000301@iogearbox.net> (Daniel Borkmann's message of
	"Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:31:03 +0200")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <874mo23px8.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ding dong is the debian drop tail queue dead?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:02:34 -0000

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> writes:

> Based on the version, looks like it takes one more stable release
> (219-7 is in experimental):
>
>   https://packages.debian.org/jessie/systemd

...but looking at the packaging rules for that (the 219-7 in
experimental), it seems debian does not use the upstream rules. The
debian 'rules' file contains:

        rm -f debian/install/*/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf


An old changelog from v204 (dated Apr 26 last year) has this explanation:

  * Do not install sysctl.d/50-default.conf because the systemd package
    should not change kernel policies, at least until it will become
    the only supported init system.

-Toke