From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A58B21F1A3 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:26:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk Sender: toke@toke.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1425327990; bh=IFYGmuhNQnEkqdZ4OBsW2aocFkka5toK1YoCvTq78FA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=tEtIHbzYuk0x0QiLwmfbEX/eYBmPfxy9Q8QOrdhvWxh+HECu3pnrDvvzO86DdbDyz Nv6y/BtAsYIYwxNxwx4/0A6Ahzy2kJPG19Mf1dCSVztUNf58z/DXqrqh1/ARNKyQYt 8TLytvXW0AXy9WeAMxsxgX5+WmDjX6t6uXGeGVaE= Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 203062A5CB5; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 21:26:29 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <54EE258E.8060302@gmail.com> <201502272200.t1RM0Aru020484@maildrop31.somerville.occnc.com> <7ia8zvjkdq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:26:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:45:35 -0800") Message-ID: <874mq3w3gq.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 20:27:06 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > Any objections here? Yes! I certainly wouldn't want to run that. > Suggestions for how to make one of the ipv6 translation techniques > work right? Turn them off? ;) -Toke