From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDEAD21F2F8
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1426773559; bh=/z38rOeHUJhVVLl301TS9xw1Uga38XiLwv8JjO28qiI=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=XjQJ2OGNZ+1OmLaBHO22yFR26ZAzG/GdQfV6nm+VHrbYk7rOpBWIi4wgUjn7JaOF7
	hL/G0nkm5KTEQSzjDJhTojpTEmsyXyQ7uGPEhLFd2zw4srjH27ryQsKSgBxIYDBWZC
	3i+tIvp9bQA5maInEwl7E/9v7ppq4QNgvjT92Vgg=
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8829638270; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:59:23 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>
References: <FE8E7564-F386-480C-A645-8F59AAC815D9@gmx.de>
	<1895D16A-1B0F-48C7-B4B5-6FC84CA92F43@gmx.de>
	<5509F8B1.6090608@gmail.com>
	<E69E8133-E4BD-420A-B3E0-0E6D5550DE6A@gmx.de>
	<550AD3F8.1000904@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:59:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <550AD3F8.1000904@gmail.com> (Alan Jenkins's message of "Thu, 19
	Mar 2015 13:49:44 +0000")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87619x84w4.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and PPPoE, more questions than answers...
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:59:58 -0000

Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> writes:

> I also notice that my test with eth1 (disabling classification) is the
> only one where UDP ping (including UDP EF) is visible for any time at
> all. (ok, pppoe-wan shows UDP BK, and it very clearly gets higher
> latency as I would expect).

FYI the svn version of netperf has a feature to restart the UDP
measurement flows after a timeout. If you build that (don't forget the
--enable-demo switch to ./configure) and stick it in your $PATH,
netperf-wrapper should pick it up automatically and use the option. This
might get you better results on the UDP flows...

-Toke