From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714B821F295
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon,  1 Dec 2014 21:53:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1417499228; bh=85r6h1qUBL68ewCRaWdtuZFxNE3LEH6iyNH24NCfVSI=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=pIrSjayBKeW6s7vMS1tte2aPpXagyujd6vi2hCBBO8LNBvByeFTldi0AevJHQY5WL
	AUzV6ugxc6i5VcgyCUB4QQxqgEjfVYS+plFUX8rgd4iJwxbyf7Lon54h8h0bNP4vnM
	oBo7esyy3SNnTelhA4b3tXaeoK5CHAfMB4ARNarY=
Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8997F1FEC3C; Tue,  2 Dec 2014 06:53:26 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <CAA93jw68EUNHyJRrKYZuc0egXZaC_9oUysqZEN-YkNfNhc6ERA@mail.gmail.com>
	<E4B2D8FC-D37B-427F-BC18-2FB79C31AA33@toke.dk>
	<878uiq23vs.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:53:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <878uiq23vs.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> (Juliusz
	Chroboczek's message of "Tue, 02 Dec 2014 03:15:51 +0100")
Message-ID: <877fya7g2x.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org" <babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] ipv6 confusion with
	source	specific	gateways.
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:54:07 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> writes:

>>> default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static metric
>>> 1024 # should I even have a default route at all?
>>
>> The source on this is actually ::/128
>
> You mean ::/0.

No, I do not, actually. That would make it just a catch-all default
route (and it would show up as such). In this case it is a
source-specific route that only matches packets originating on the host
that don't specify a source IP.

-Toke