From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1439C2021DD for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:47:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D455016AA9; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 19:47:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1391971659; bh=xxWQk/Oa6LtjRYD+NLdJFmNP1arl46yAFQ9uiVGKSqg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NCUZN8QnImhrA3UgP5GGPMpMLJjKhIiFHIolNBAD1LV9nbOMzIGczg8mzVmd6eCQu cZGmnHofdkxuT1b+LGb9eGo8w+xvaoipS4gZGEZ3UOMidxiBNtitbZIA/t7sFDRwKx AwRXYZBlbV4fjuppKfaflzd1scqLjavKkuERa82g= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <87a9e6xcae.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <87ob2lmqny.fsf@toke.dk> <52F29645.6010001@thekelleys.org.uk> <874n4dwcdb.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F2BA80.9010202@thekelleys.org.uk> <87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F369AA.5060809@thekelleys.org.uk> <8761osv78r.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F371B3.5030406@thekelleys.org.uk> <87k3d8mna8.fsf@toke.dk> <52F3A3B2.8020201@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppmw7ajj.fsf@toke.dk> <52F77349.40305@thekelleys.org.uk> <87lhxk78pa.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:47:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:04:55 -0800") Message-ID: <878utk6s3a.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Testers wanted: DNSSEC. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:47:47 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > Got the right time? Yeah, that was my thought as well. Checked that, though; the router does seem to know what time it is. > I have no idea how to deal with the time headache still, besides > adding an un-validating-resolver to ntpdate, and sanity checks in > dnsmasq like (if system time is < my build time, don't do dnssec) - > but the latter is imperfect. > > http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/113 So far I've been using the 'screw it' approach and just putting in an ntp server by IP address for my own private builds. Would love to see a better solution, though. -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS981JAAoJEENeEGz1+utPoA4H/3peOVm7EjL+S20qhUGye5FT TMAimjs7945fKtaAnYUz4Tam0lKLc+Uw9LT15zWb4Pn7Mmmq3CEWTEw6w5zTh/XB IjsrmYp3dDDgPXLrIMNO1GWRDc3jTGorTBhgl5ac4ZjA4hbXIF0qYnh8VKWItIX/ nKqwnWKKwVmJJ/Ue/wHmFHjGtGmXNx/OgfWN6TRIMW67F2xiUNkc8LZ8lncyuJh7 7nFLe82CsxTOQMQ2FH6RtxZDmu9VCPw4Iq++kUNNk43hc/AHiprtPJARnB55x3WI aXdFcO13Oy6GqzS/IZKqsM0pzADmE+TgH8+D8okBJJGusrz0JdFjVGyxGljNj4o= =W7Bn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--