From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBF9821F1D6 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:18:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA8D51BDB4; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:18:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1395512288; bh=jHYALJu1GoYUdtED9R2KCqgx3n3F27uk7SKA57byXqM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=o6JpMRyTAiWQsUcXbhhJvKAE2G8XuwlK9YwSfXXa2WkJWp/28MMZs4RPEe82s0cvh Di1UD3niRKRPrzkQZAHgY8GpX59b9/uzXemmHqOKCAGkgQRvRbNKyhEHqPmz40CNgy Az77iXFTpgUtAY9aPe0hMUO0FQTaEz7pdZp6lDHE= From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <3F98D180-3AF8-4AFA-80B4-A13E55CAA03A@gmx.de> <87mwgjtb8z.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <7F1EA8E6-0C2E-471D-A24F-8D08A10998FC@gmx.de> <87ior7t9ov.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <608F3E46-3D81-48A3-B60C-E90661DD3AB2@gmx.de> <87eh1utrqu.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:18:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:09:38 +0000") Message-ID: <87a9cit7vm.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-12 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:18:18 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > Perhaps this is a new logo idea for cero: A giant clue-bat. That'd be cool. I've always wondered what a clue-bat would actually look like... :) > Well, a brute force way would be to insert all these addresses with > say a one hour timeout to expire on a cold boot. Yeah, but then you'd have to handle collisions with subnets configured on the internal interface and all sorts of weird edge cases, I'm sure... Perhaps some sort of feasibility study on the arping approach could be conducted? Someone with a cable modem who can check if `arping ` with its configuration address returns anything when no corresponding address is configured on the router? Or am I completely off base in thinking that would work? > In terms of featureitus it might be nice to have a comment field shown > in the gui and in the config file. Right, well if you don't mind restructuring the config file completely in a non-backwards-compatible way, it would be pretty easy to give it a section for each subnet, with an associated comment / name field, and use the same widget as the hostname setup. Would make the config file significantly more verbose, though, and also harder to read IMO... -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTLdPdAAoJEENeEGz1+utPh24H/18iieuvqlWltEIN/irQvgIW iRsS3XEMlPfKWTC3AImpU03tAxsobT9rdsHI6cVxJiQRecoNCNdJo3TZrlBI5/ST qr4Q4eoYsrCl8MwPBRvBpNcws7YJy6URrXsji8MCGraeIjBaVElCMBwS/LTq1M02 FzYgVXyTLnTqlF3Rjhm7U0/03abVerJ3GPe5/TM367Yry8MSkgzHFqgnFyez5Ur4 XDebONrNpCG2rmi5+EX1CIx68d9ryMG3vUCEFGw7dSjY9ASx2BWzpZYjNxXYzyti 4FKOK+eZePjVcaVO7Vpt3a4PvtsdFSz7rNh6KP60bGfndZ8mb2/wW2SefDKJN0Q= =pyAw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--