From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.tohojo.dk (mail.tohojo.dk [188.40.53.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732D721F201 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (unknown [10.42.3.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tohojo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AE271EC0907; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:04:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 725FFF3A0; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:04:30 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: <87ip1dpw2y.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:04:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:55:56 -0700") Message-ID: <87a9mppv9w.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] babeld change X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:04:33 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dave Taht writes: > Hmm. Does this mean you have 6in4 working correctly in your build of > cero? I'm still just doing it with a script, not netifd. Yeah. I have this in /etc/config/network: config interface sixxs option 'proto' '6in4' option 'ifname' 'sixxs' option peeraddr ' option ip6addr '' option ip6prefix '/48' option mtu '1480' option ipaddr '' and each internal interface definition then has a option 'ip6assign' '64' optionally with option 'ip6hint '1' to force the :1::/64 subnet to be assigned to the interface. > Hmm. We're back at wanting a message bus or std kernel api for dealing > with the ip rule database again... I fear that things like openvpn or > strongswan will really mess with this. Isn't that message bus called netlink? > Babel head has three branches doing new stuff. In particular, the > configuration syntax is changing in some respects... Yeah, I noticed everything is becoming configurable from the config file. > hah. I just realized that a couple of the commits in babeld head were > yours. cool. no need for me to lecture. Well, my setup broke when openwrt did the multi-wan stuff. Had to fix that... :P > One thing that always bugged me about previous versions of babeld was > that it didn't chomp whitespace at the end of a line, hopefully that's > fixed somewhere in this patch series... Isn't that something you set your editor to do? :P -Toke --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvjZrAAoJEENeEGz1+utP/F8H/10wfV90njgAodcGdHvXE+Rv wjy5ntdrUUX0H+h9bmnrmWDsjZUPhvURsuwvAVYkUzLKXYnWxunJZwp+DiCSdJQc GS66XoH4Uz5WoE24vrblVbXdOd+M83spbYf+ZbVXuI4cE7kmbQgj1D5gxLGaG8+J de/9T66h7DCt0a6o//aGers9mtLiEUpMQk81wDPDf8+OO0XFg+hDUGJJ6rRni+YZ 09T6//hDj0pNWStq00cn2kYGVmBCILvf7vPlEADNEd9cMrLQNdT0clpZnXUIgdrs pE6YlT0h2sScZIEo/OuFL4svsuU9yIHV6G/0GEQA1pMjyJbvOg9U2WiaquuDIls= =QASJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--