From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B912F3CB35
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Thu,  6 Dec 2018 02:50:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1544082658; bh=IdEvVrYGTZ0hSv237xDgIcLP6ANaku4P5OW/C2zl25o=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=GofX4IO4k1diQW94gPhjbyEBIZVmLBysar728wmne9tBJw1QhWqhYnucgKnS7fXJL
 zVsnjcWRtux3+QIRnzkhhyUo7Thgge7DwPEwfnIaICMPrVjUbCEy7BjF88LpJpjapW
 4uJ+s3BvURmKgvE7Xxo1pEZKw09irPEb0f2HwBmncLklB0y7kjk6WOt0AmX8PZR5jG
 yrZ4XJaDHO5jqqIW5pPyNphB7OV5VYnUb/SxLGETCidTMxk9lvIUB2MSEg3elx5xKE
 zvKdpAPHiaoBWDtWd0i1Beg1iOzeOhPtgvrJhjd/ufnKFGE4NhQrpSkiN6HuTBz1aE
 uNjaIkvGyxDeQ==
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
 cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5sU9SPAPPO2bO0-ysMsXKBiMxEZqsP=Efdt4G6X9VPhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw5sU9SPAPPO2bO0-ysMsXKBiMxEZqsP=Efdt4G6X9VPhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:50:55 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87bm5zgkkg.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] fq_pie for linux
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 07:50:59 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> https://github.com/gautamramk/FQ-PIE-for-Linux-Kernel/issues/2

With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for each
variant...

-Toke