From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935D43B29E
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Thu,  2 Aug 2018 16:08:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1533240491; bh=NreTxFBrQPVvHt6xzb7BCPSb+hrOuynkbS2eZZcWhBE=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=lrIRbGpBhEpTKFmlSux1AEzq3wFEFDju/xO38aGbD+2xj+aCaJ8PlhzI7tJT/GkhH
 cCwCLIv67euKlG2ugpdMv2UXM7x9iOJK+CqBQr0fqNp3Thok7ksZzOMSqhulVQrqft
 n7lp9RUsUIyln9h72I4ACvmmepDAbGeD/NJmunKlblO3a6GQ4F+c1HAR1rUYPJw/r/
 qgQt9HTWR0QPVUjA1x0B8eOXnQu95etND3gGwdfCfAcuwRCVaEWWoPmyls0zwqnDyv
 LdlyXiZxA7UQRJScli11hfGAN4aiDK5BhL7ltMIxr6jBtvOcjJgs105gAHMRzh3P1i
 aqlgpy4oKVapg==
To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <77490.1533237914@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <20180801.213753.1303803168352407122.davem@davemloft.net>
 <CA+55aFz5EWE9OTbzDoMfsY2ez04Qv9eg0KQhwKfyJY0vFvoD3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw57zrqugHiu1p0PZyr5ymLC_dy4dDFRDpyW_LwJ7KRhEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1533235277.205214909@apps.rackspace.com>
 <CAA93jw7o1__aXv8N-S60YcLf=VtTT=PSxEnbte0jyd6KLZnSJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <77490.1533237914@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:08:12 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87d0v0y1jn.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] linus vs wireguard
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 20:08:12 -0000

valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu writes:

> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:56:59 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>
>> I just spent a few hugely frustrating days trying to code in and being
>> frightened by, ebpf. While I hates it thus far, a mini-language of
>> some sort suitable for hardware offloads seems useful.
>
> That's just screaming for an ebpf to FPGA compiler. :)

There is already eBPF offload support in the nfp driver for Netronome
cards :)

-Toke