From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:3141::101])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7111521F2A1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu,  3 Apr 2014 23:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E5DD61DA90; Fri,  4 Apr 2014 08:57:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1396594664; bh=kL2NexlDGbOHqwXkZRu2pS5ekLIHa43/HHaa1YbONtg=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=L7eOVmSU8WvOz5sutKylNae0jsCSID4qVUSUoqd5NpyyOUs2WGCM8hH7FlFM/wLTG
	I1Kx+KwL8fbep/7AWX+OyIbbe02pgwzAzUjhuoynjCmd94mxWlfZyNyrN6kyyZy0PI
	ZsT0nTINn1gmcuBUlvTQPatDt7wIEuy+1t2Uh3Ag=
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6etj1w-OAv-Npv6hvLSXgcE+-CuNcNkFXaY9p8Ht352A@mail.gmail.com>
	<533DA665.2050305@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw53noY89_vRmWoi_Am6Qo3JbEDNL1VnifHbX06RZKri_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:57:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw53noY89_vRmWoi_Am6Qo3JbEDNL1VnifHbX06RZKri_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dave Taht's message of "Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:36:37 -0700")
Message-ID: <87d2gxlgyi.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.34-4 dev build released
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:57:52 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there a recent version that people had that was seemingly stable for
> wifi that we could step back to and bisect from? Something where
> you had heavy wifu use for week(s) without a problem?

FWIW I haven't seen the issue I had again. Am currently at just under 6
days of uptime, and ~14 gigs transferred out the 5ghz wifi with no
issues. Still on the same build (derived 3.10.32-12) that I had the
problem with before...

Will upgrade to HEAD over the weekend.

-Toke

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTPlflAAoJEENeEGz1+utPPo8H/0ELEtLz1iwZVl4okFrs3VId
ZT97QkP2lg+m8oHOWJVQfNuh6dGTFZ8bCJfW83t5Ol1G36YHeF4JqNjmzNZQQ/u4
KFk7b67pnwSvp1q9Tma1Zlo5ixiV9Y5jlk2kysbA2uzoqPxmBuZhpYq1Vj8SDzvc
lsHwszi8Sqc5km84qSEjOl5/hcBMAX3w7LSursK+gMqtQbW5y6Z72c5dSJ7VInJo
6FqLGNINn8eqlogcdJeUVwF90rPKUzkrVNFutGFQ6+LAyzaroBA4o39KabIIFumv
P2jZjPvEu6DS7dSbf2KTsctnkjF6rtjkzgAH9hVWF9u5rldQ8j4KfTx/o98t1cM=
=lkle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--